Combining Quantitative Measurement Tools with Theoretical Frameworks to Examine Structural Determinants on Reproductive Decision Making Among African American Women

Abstract Introduction Racial disparities in sexual and reproductive health are an ongoing injustice in the US, affecting pregnancy and maternal and infant health. This exploratory study sought to use Intersectionality and Critical Race Theory as theoretical frameworks to examine a sample of African American women’s experiences with trauma, stress, depression, discrimination, and reproductive decision-making, and to examine their experiences relative to income level. Methods This cross-sectional community survey study included African American women from lower and higher income strata and compared their scores in key measures of mental health and discrimination: Adverse Childhood Experiences Questionnaire (ACE), the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2), the Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10), and the Everyday Discrimination Scale (EDS), and their experiences with pregnancy and birth control and demographic data collected from the Family Planning Study of African American Women (FPSAAW) questionnaire used in this study. Results The mean ACE, PHQ-2, and PSS-10 scores were higher for the lower income group, and the EDS mean score was higher for the higher income group, though none of these differences reached between-group statistical significance. The FPSAAW found non-significant differences in contraceptive preferences and use and decision-making agency between income groups. Conclusions African American women’s reproductive decisions are shaped by the intersection of micro-level and macro-level factors. Examining context, including mental health history, discrimination, and the intersection of their identities and social context provides important insight for reproductive planning. It is necessary to examine the needs of African American women using theoretical frameworks that center their experiences, particularly related to their mental health and reproductive health care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-026-03244-z
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combining Quantitative Measurement Tools with Theoretical Frameworks to Examine Structural Determinants on Reproductive Decision Making Among African American Women

Jill Strickland Denson
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

Combining Quantitative Measurement Tools with Theoretical Frameworks to Examine Structural Determinants on Reproductive Decision Making Among African American Women

Jill Strickland Denson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Racial disparities in sexual and reproductive health are an ongoing injustice in the US, affecting pregnancy and maternal and infant health. This exploratory study sought to use Intersectionality and Critical Race Theory as theoretical frameworks to examine a sample of African American women’s experiences with trauma, stress, depression, discrimination, and reproductive decision-making, and to examine their experiences relative to income level. Methods This cross-sectional community survey study included African American women from lower and higher income strata and compared their scores in key measures of mental health and discrimination: Adverse Childhood Experiences Questionnaire (ACE), the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2), the Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10), and the Everyday Discrimination Scale (EDS), and their experiences with pregnancy and birth control and demographic data collected from the Family Planning Study of African American Women (FPSAAW) questionnaire used in this study. Results The mean ACE, PHQ-2, and PSS-10 scores were higher for the lower income group, and the EDS mean score was higher for the higher income group, though none of these differences reached between-group statistical significance. The FPSAAW found non-significant differences in contraceptive preferences and use and decision-making agency between income groups. Conclusions African American women’s reproductive decisions are shaped by the intersection of micro-level and macro-level factors. Examining context, including mental health history, discrimination, and the intersection of their identities and social context provides important insight for reproductive planning. It is necessary to examine the needs of African American women using theoretical frameworks that center their experiences, particularly related to their mental health and reproductive health care.

Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon