Human judgment as a design variable in AI-enabled decision systems

Artificial intelligence is changing organisational decision making as capabilities increasingly move towards autonomous decisions and actions. The central challenge has moved beyond discussion of whether humans or machines make better decisions. It is now focused on designing systems that combine AI with human judgement to improve decision quality. This article argues that human judgement in AI-enabled systems should be designed, allocated and evaluated at the system level, rather than treated as a binary safeguard. Human involvement can be configured according to where judgement enters the process, when intervention occurs, how much authority humans retain, and what form of judgement is required. This perspective shifts the unit of analysis from the individual decision maker or AI model to the human–AI decision system. This article highlights emerging risks involved in the expansion of accountability for AI-enabled decisions. It also identifies the expertise paradox where AI automates the work through which humans actually develop the experience needed to supervise autonomous systems. This creates an important research agenda to help design intelligent decision systems and the role of the decision maker itself.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Operational Research Society
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2026.2753681
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human judgment as a design variable in AI-enabled decision systems

Nada R. Sanders
2 links
Journal of the Operational Research Society
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Human judgment as a design variable in AI-enabled decision systems

Nada R. Sanders
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is changing organisational decision making as capabilities increasingly move towards autonomous decisions and actions. The central challenge has moved beyond discussion of whether humans or machines make better decisions. It is now focused on designing systems that combine AI with human judgement to improve decision quality. This article argues that human judgement in AI-enabled systems should be designed, allocated and evaluated at the system level, rather than treated as a binary safeguard. Human involvement can be configured according to where judgement enters the process, when intervention occurs, how much authority humans retain, and what form of judgement is required. This perspective shifts the unit of analysis from the individual decision maker or AI model to the human–AI decision system. This article highlights emerging risks involved in the expansion of accountability for AI-enabled decisions. It also identifies the expertise paradox where AI automates the work through which humans actually develop the experience needed to supervise autonomous systems. This creates an important research agenda to help design intelligent decision systems and the role of the decision maker itself.

Journal of the Operational Research Society
Northeastern University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Human judgment as a design variable in AI-enabled decision systems — Nada R. Sanders · Journal of the Operational Research Society (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS