New concept of maxillary distraction in adolescent patients with cleft lip and palate

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of intraoral maxillary distraction osteogenesis (DO) as a staged treatment strategy in adolescent patients with cleft lip and/or palate (CLP), severe maxillary hypoplasia, and midfacial growth deficiency. Patients and Methods: Five patients (one male and four females; mean age, 15 years 11 months) who underwent maxillary DO between 2020 and 2025 were included. After preoperative computer-assisted three-dimensional virtual planning to determine the distraction vector and distractor placement, Le Fort I osteotomy and intraoral distractors were placed. Following bilateral distraction at 1.0 mm/day per side after 3 to 4 days latency and approximately 3 months consolidation period, the distractor was removed and the maxilla was fixed at the zygomatic buttress using bioresorbable plates. Skeletal changes were evaluated using lateral cephalograms obtained at T0 (preoperative), T1 (after distractor removal), and T2 (1 year after surgery). Results: The mean operative time was 64 minutes. In all patients, distraction was completed without intraoperative modification of the distraction vector or placement of the distractor. Mean linear movement of point A at T1 was 11.0 mm, including 8.9 mm horizontally and 5.7 mm vertically. Mean relapse of point A from T1 to T2 was 2.3 mm (25.7%) horizontally and 2.1 mm (37.5%) vertically. Despite this relapse, point A at T2 showed a mean anteroinferior movement of 7.5 mm relative to that at T0. Major complications were not observed. Serial videoendoscopic evaluations revealed no apparent deterioration in soft palate or pharyngeal wall movements during the treatments. Four patients subsequently underwent definitive orthognathic surgery, whereas one patient achieved a favorable skeletal and occlusal relationship with distraction alone. Conclusion: Intraoral maxillary DO may be a useful staged treatment option for adolescents with CLP and severe maxillary hypoplasia, providing skeletal improvement before definitive orthognathic surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
대한구강악안면외과학회지
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2026.52.5.248
Primary Topic
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New concept of maxillary distraction in adolescent patients with cleft lip and palate

Yuhei Matsuda, Reon Morioka, Masako Fujioka‐Kobayashi, Kotone Murakami et al.
대한구강악안면외과학회지
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
article

New concept of maxillary distraction in adolescent patients with cleft lip and palate

Yuhei Matsuda, Reon Morioka, Masako Fujioka‐Kobayashi, Kotone Murakami, Hiroto Tatsumi, Michitaka Somoto, Rie Sonoyama-Osako, Takahiro Kanno
article en

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of intraoral maxillary distraction osteogenesis (DO) as a staged treatment strategy in adolescent patients with cleft lip and/or palate (CLP), severe maxillary hypoplasia, and midfacial growth deficiency. Patients and Methods: Five patients (one male and four females; mean age, 15 years 11 months) who underwent maxillary DO between 2020 and 2025 were included. After preoperative computer-assisted three-dimensional virtual planning to determine the distraction vector and distractor placement, Le Fort I osteotomy and intraoral distractors were placed. Following bilateral distraction at 1.0 mm/day per side after 3 to 4 days latency and approximately 3 months consolidation period, the distractor was removed and the maxilla was fixed at the zygomatic buttress using bioresorbable plates. Skeletal changes were evaluated using lateral cephalograms obtained at T0 (preoperative), T1 (after distractor removal), and T2 (1 year after surgery). Results: The mean operative time was 64 minutes. In all patients, distraction was completed without intraoperative modification of the distraction vector or placement of the distractor. Mean linear movement of point A at T1 was 11.0 mm, including 8.9 mm horizontally and 5.7 mm vertically. Mean relapse of point A from T1 to T2 was 2.3 mm (25.7%) horizontally and 2.1 mm (37.5%) vertically. Despite this relapse, point A at T2 showed a mean anteroinferior movement of 7.5 mm relative to that at T0. Major complications were not observed. Serial videoendoscopic evaluations revealed no apparent deterioration in soft palate or pharyngeal wall movements during the treatments. Four patients subsequently underwent definitive orthognathic surgery, whereas one patient achieved a favorable skeletal and occlusal relationship with distraction alone. Conclusion: Intraoral maxillary DO may be a useful staged treatment option for adolescents with CLP and severe maxillary hypoplasia, providing skeletal improvement before definitive orthognathic surgery.

대한구강악안면외과학회지Vol. 52(5)
Shimane University (JP), Shimane University Hospital (JP)
Shimane University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon