Turning the tide in request negotiations: the role of accounts and reasonableness

Abstract Despite being a fundamentally prosocial species, humans sometimes resist helping others. Using conversation analysis supplemented by structured coding, this study examines how people navigate this social problem in everyday negotiations over requests. We focus on how interactions shift from heading toward rejection to moving toward compliance, a process we refer to as reaching a “turning point.” When requesters pursue compliance, they may do so by applying pressure or by engaging the requestee’s account for resistance. We show that addressing resistance accounts enables the removal of barriers to compliance, thereby facilitating turning points. By contrast, reliance on pressure inhibits turning points, and, when it does produce them, typically does so only after protracted and disaffiliative exchanges. Overall, the study advances a sociological understanding of everyday negotiation, highlighting how reason giving structures the trajectory of resistance, pursuit, compliance, and relational cohesion in fraught interactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Problems
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spag070
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Turning the tide in request negotiations: the role of accounts and reasonableness

Giovanni Rossi, Andrew Chalfoun, Tanya Stivers
Social Problems
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
article

Turning the tide in request negotiations: the role of accounts and reasonableness

Giovanni Rossi, Andrew Chalfoun, Tanya Stivers
article en

Abstract

Abstract Despite being a fundamentally prosocial species, humans sometimes resist helping others. Using conversation analysis supplemented by structured coding, this study examines how people navigate this social problem in everyday negotiations over requests. We focus on how interactions shift from heading toward rejection to moving toward compliance, a process we refer to as reaching a “turning point.” When requesters pursue compliance, they may do so by applying pressure or by engaging the requestee’s account for resistance. We show that addressing resistance accounts enables the removal of barriers to compliance, thereby facilitating turning points. By contrast, reliance on pressure inhibits turning points, and, when it does produce them, typically does so only after protracted and disaffiliative exchanges. Overall, the study advances a sociological understanding of everyday negotiation, highlighting how reason giving structures the trajectory of resistance, pursuit, compliance, and relational cohesion in fraught interactions.

Social Problems
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Advanced Research Projects Agency
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Turning the tide in request negotiations: the role of accounts and reasonableness — Giovanni Rossi, Andrew Chalfoun, et al. · Social Problems (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS