IMPLICIT LEARNING: REACTION OUTCOME PREDICTION FROM POSITIVE-ONLY DATA

Machine learning models for reaction product prediction have largely been trained and evaluated on datasets of successful reactions. While this setting allows reaching high accuracy scores, these models generally struggle to discriminate between successful and unsuccessful transformations due to the lack of negative training data. This critically limits their practical use, as reliably recognizing unproductive substrate combinations in silico is required to accelerate experimental campaigns and save resources in the laboratory. While the availability of negative reaction data remains limited to date, we show that even purely positive datasets implicitly contain a significant amount of information about cases in which no reaction occurs. To exploit this, we introduce TACIT (TAckling Chemistry through ImpliciT negative learning). While trained on positive-only data, TACIT learns to distinguish between productive and unproductive transformations. On two published high-throughput experimentation datasets, it outperforms all evaluated reaction outcome prediction models in separating successful from failed reactions. Crucially, TACIT’s accuracy on the popular USPTO-MIT benchmark remains competitive, despite its added ability to predict negative reaction outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ChemRxiv
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.15011216/v1
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

IMPLICIT LEARNING: REACTION OUTCOME PREDICTION FROM POSITIVE-ONLY DATA

Nick Wierich, Frank Glorius, Niklas Dobberstein
ChemRxiv
Machine Learning in Materials Science
preprint

IMPLICIT LEARNING: REACTION OUTCOME PREDICTION FROM POSITIVE-ONLY DATA

Nick Wierich, Frank Glorius, Niklas Dobberstein
preprint en

Abstract

Machine learning models for reaction product prediction have largely been trained and evaluated on datasets of successful reactions. While this setting allows reaching high accuracy scores, these models generally struggle to discriminate between successful and unsuccessful transformations due to the lack of negative training data. This critically limits their practical use, as reliably recognizing unproductive substrate combinations in silico is required to accelerate experimental campaigns and save resources in the laboratory. While the availability of negative reaction data remains limited to date, we show that even purely positive datasets implicitly contain a significant amount of information about cases in which no reaction occurs. To exploit this, we introduce TACIT (TAckling Chemistry through ImpliciT negative learning). While trained on positive-only data, TACIT learns to distinguish between productive and unproductive transformations. On two published high-throughput experimentation datasets, it outperforms all evaluated reaction outcome prediction models in separating successful from failed reactions. Crucially, TACIT’s accuracy on the popular USPTO-MIT benchmark remains competitive, despite its added ability to predict negative reaction outcomes.

ChemRxiv
University of Münster (DE)
Machine Learning in Materials Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
IMPLICIT LEARNING: REACTION OUTCOME PREDICTION FROM POSITIVE-ONLY DATA — Nick Wierich, Frank Glorius, et al. · ChemRxiv (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS