Frugal AI Models Show Uneven Accuracy Loss That Threatens Reliable Environmental Decision Making

Abstract Frugal, compressed, and edge AI models produced through pruning, quantization, knowledge distillation, and TinyML design are increasingly promoted as the accessible route by which resource-constrained firms can adopt AI-driven environmental decision tools without the computational cost of full-scale models. Yet compression degrades model accuracy unevenly and unpredictably across architectures, raising concern that the same resource constraint making frugal AI attractive as an accessibility solution also makes its accuracy risk hardest to detect. This paper reports a PRISMA 2020-compliant systematic review of the literature at the intersection of frugal AI and environmental sustainability. Searches of Scopus and Web of Science returned 283 records, reducing to 224 unique records after deduplication and 31 included studies after title/abstract and full-text screening. The corpus was characterised descriptively and coded against seven a priori constructs spanning accuracy-resource trade-offs, resource-constrained context, decision-consequentiality, the AI system's own environmental footprint, uncertainty/reliability treatment, field validation, and theoretical grounding in the Green/frugal-AI literature; an exploratory topic model (Latent Dirichlet Allocation, K = 5) provided an independent, corroborating lens. Accuracy-resource trade-offs and resource-constrained context were reported almost universally, as required by the review's own eligibility criteria, but decision-consequentiality (54.8%), the AI system's own footprint (32.3%), field validation (48.4%), and theoretical grounding (19.4%) were each reported in fewer than three in five studies. These reporting gaps motivate the Frugal AI Environmental Efficacy (FAEE) framework, presented here as a conceptual synthesis not an empirically validated typology for locating frugal-AI-for-environment applications along axes of compression aggressiveness and decision consequentiality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11005153/v1
Primary Topic
Advanced Neural Network Applications
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Frugal AI Models Show Uneven Accuracy Loss That Threatens Reliable Environmental Decision Making

Ahmed H. Alsharif, Nohman Khan, Javed Ali, Huma Sikandar et al.
2 links
Research Square
Advanced Neural Network Applications
preprint

Frugal AI Models Show Uneven Accuracy Loss That Threatens Reliable Environmental Decision Making

Ahmed H. Alsharif, Nohman Khan, Javed Ali, Huma Sikandar, Hamad Raza
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Frugal, compressed, and edge AI models produced through pruning, quantization, knowledge distillation, and TinyML design are increasingly promoted as the accessible route by which resource-constrained firms can adopt AI-driven environmental decision tools without the computational cost of full-scale models. Yet compression degrades model accuracy unevenly and unpredictably across architectures, raising concern that the same resource constraint making frugal AI attractive as an accessibility solution also makes its accuracy risk hardest to detect. This paper reports a PRISMA 2020-compliant systematic review of the literature at the intersection of frugal AI and environmental sustainability. Searches of Scopus and Web of Science returned 283 records, reducing to 224 unique records after deduplication and 31 included studies after title/abstract and full-text screening. The corpus was characterised descriptively and coded against seven a priori constructs spanning accuracy-resource trade-offs, resource-constrained context, decision-consequentiality, the AI system's own environmental footprint, uncertainty/reliability treatment, field validation, and theoretical grounding in the Green/frugal-AI literature; an exploratory topic model (Latent Dirichlet Allocation, K = 5) provided an independent, corroborating lens. Accuracy-resource trade-offs and resource-constrained context were reported almost universally, as required by the review's own eligibility criteria, but decision-consequentiality (54.8%), the AI system's own footprint (32.3%), field validation (48.4%), and theoretical grounding (19.4%) were each reported in fewer than three in five studies. These reporting gaps motivate the Frugal AI Environmental Efficacy (FAEE) framework, presented here as a conceptual synthesis not an empirically validated typology for locating frugal-AI-for-environment applications along axes of compression aggressiveness and decision consequentiality.

Research Square
Asia Pacific University of Technology & Innovation (MY), Government College University, Faisalabad (PK), University of Malaya (MY), University of Technology Malaysia (MY), Sukkur IBA University (PK)
Climate action
Advanced Neural Network Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon