Aldred on A nger : A Study of Lexical Choices in Context

In the tenth century, Aldred, a Late Old Northumbrian speaker, added interlinear glosses to the Lindisfarne Gospels and the so-called Durham Ritual or Collectar. This paper explores his approaches to translating Latin terms referring to ANGER (members of the L ira and indignatio word families, and L furor) in the context of a wider range of Old English biblical glosses / translations. The analysis presented here shows that, while the latter are fairly consistent in their rendering of the Latin terms, Aldred’s lexical choices are significantly different regarding his interpretamenta and his frequent disregard for lexical distinctions in the Latin text. Notable lexical disparities in Aldred’s glosses are also identified. Accordingly, this paper offers important findings for ongoing scholarly debates on Aldred’s access to various sources, his intellectual interests, and the expression of emotions in early medieval England, a research area where Late Old Northumbrian texts have hardly featured.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
English Studies
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/0013838x.2026.2745976
Primary Topic
Medieval Literature and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aldred on A nger : A Study of Lexical Choices in Context

Sara M. Pons‐Sanz
English Studies
Medieval Literature and History
article

Aldred on A nger : A Study of Lexical Choices in Context

Sara M. Pons‐Sanz
article en

Abstract

In the tenth century, Aldred, a Late Old Northumbrian speaker, added interlinear glosses to the Lindisfarne Gospels and the so-called Durham Ritual or Collectar. This paper explores his approaches to translating Latin terms referring to ANGER (members of the L ira and indignatio word families, and L furor) in the context of a wider range of Old English biblical glosses / translations. The analysis presented here shows that, while the latter are fairly consistent in their rendering of the Latin terms, Aldred’s lexical choices are significantly different regarding his interpretamenta and his frequent disregard for lexical distinctions in the Latin text. Notable lexical disparities in Aldred’s glosses are also identified. Accordingly, this paper offers important findings for ongoing scholarly debates on Aldred’s access to various sources, his intellectual interests, and the expression of emotions in early medieval England, a research area where Late Old Northumbrian texts have hardly featured.

English Studies
Cardiff University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Medieval Literature and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon