DiaBench: A Benchmarking Framework to Evaluate the Performance of LLMs in T2D Patient Education

Background Effective type 2 diabetes (T2D) education improves patient outcomes, but clinician time constraints limit what can be covered during encounters. Large language models (LLMs) offer a scalable way to answer patient questions, yet their accuracy and reliability in T2D education across health literacy levels remain poorly characterized. Methods We developed DiaBench, a standardized benchmarking framework built from 96 question-and-answer pairs collected by clinicians from representative real-world patient encounters. GPT-5 transformed each pair into multiple-choice questions (MCQs) under three configurations (1-3) simulating different question formats and levels of user background. A five-member panel of certified diabetes care and education specialists (CDCESs), medical doctors (MDs), and endocrinologists validated the transformations, rating question rephrasing, answer rephrasing, and answer correctness. We then evaluated seven LLMs (GPT-51, Gemini-2.5-Flash2, Cohere Command3, Llama-44, DeepSeek-R15, Perplexity Sonar6, Mistral-Large-2.07) for accuracy and self-consistency across three runs. Results (i) Expert validation showed a consensus over MCQ transformation. For configuration 1, 98.1% (SD 0.01) of rephrased answers were appropriate, 98.1% (SD 0.01) of MCQ answers were correct, and 95.0% (SD 0.05) of rephrased questions were appropriate; corresponding values for configuration 2 were 96.3% (SD 0.05), 97.5% (SD 0.02), and 89.8% (SD 0.14). (ii) across benchmarking for configurations 1 and 2, most models achieved high accuracy (≥95%), but Mistral-Large-2.0, Llama 4, and Perplexity Sonar showed substantially lower self-consistency (60.4%-91.7%) than other models (≥95%). All models degraded in both accuracy and self-consistency on configuration 3. Conclusions DiaBench quantitatively differentiates LLM capability in T2D patient education, with Gemini, GPT-5, and DeepSeek-R1 performing strongly and other models suboptimally. DiaBench provides a transferable platform for evaluating existing and newly developed LLMs, addressing the need for standardized benchmarking before clinical deployment of LLM-based systems in patient education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
medRxiv
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.26.26366562
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
preprint

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

DiaBench: A Benchmarking Framework to Evaluate the Performance of LLMs in T2D Patient Education

Jacob D. Kohlenberg, Marina Basina, Anna Simos, Elizabeth Healey et al.
3 links
medRxiv
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
preprint

DiaBench: A Benchmarking Framework to Evaluate the Performance of LLMs in T2D Patient Education

Jacob D. Kohlenberg, Marina Basina, Anna Simos, Elizabeth Healey, David Charles Klonoff, Syna Syna, Bhavana Kunisetty, Michael Snyder, Haipeng Chen, Yang Li, Mandy Shao, Yu Kuei Lin, Agatha Scheideman, Chuyi Zhang, Yanfu Zhang, Tao Wang, Han Meng
preprint en

Abstract

Background Effective type 2 diabetes (T2D) education improves patient outcomes, but clinician time constraints limit what can be covered during encounters. Large language models (LLMs) offer a scalable way to answer patient questions, yet their accuracy and reliability in T2D education across health literacy levels remain poorly characterized. Methods We developed DiaBench, a standardized benchmarking framework built from 96 question-and-answer pairs collected by clinicians from representative real-world patient encounters. GPT-5 transformed each pair into multiple-choice questions (MCQs) under three configurations (1-3) simulating different question formats and levels of user background. A five-member panel of certified diabetes care and education specialists (CDCESs), medical doctors (MDs), and endocrinologists validated the transformations, rating question rephrasing, answer rephrasing, and answer correctness. We then evaluated seven LLMs (GPT-51, Gemini-2.5-Flash2, Cohere Command3, Llama-44, DeepSeek-R15, Perplexity Sonar6, Mistral-Large-2.07) for accuracy and self-consistency across three runs. Results (i) Expert validation showed a consensus over MCQ transformation. For configuration 1, 98.1% (SD 0.01) of rephrased answers were appropriate, 98.1% (SD 0.01) of MCQ answers were correct, and 95.0% (SD 0.05) of rephrased questions were appropriate; corresponding values for configuration 2 were 96.3% (SD 0.05), 97.5% (SD 0.02), and 89.8% (SD 0.14). (ii) across benchmarking for configurations 1 and 2, most models achieved high accuracy (≥95%), but Mistral-Large-2.0, Llama 4, and Perplexity Sonar showed substantially lower self-consistency (60.4%-91.7%) than other models (≥95%). All models degraded in both accuracy and self-consistency on configuration 3. Conclusions DiaBench quantitatively differentiates LLM capability in T2D patient education, with Gemini, GPT-5, and DeepSeek-R1 performing strongly and other models suboptimally. DiaBench provides a transferable platform for evaluating existing and newly developed LLMs, addressing the need for standardized benchmarking before clinical deployment of LLM-based systems in patient education.

medRxiv
Boston Children's Hospital (US), University of Minnesota (US), William & Mary (US), University of Michigan (US), Mills Peninsula Health Services (US), Diabetes Technology Society (US), Stanford University (US)
Sanofi, Dexcom, National Institutes of Health
Good health and well-being
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon