Apology Pizza: Measuring Bounded Remedies in Customer Support

Customer support agents can offer polite text while taking the wrong financial action. Apology Pizza measures bounded remedy execution on 40 synthetic complaints across 8 scenario classes. We evaluate 12 scripted controls through the live tool environment and replay grader. A scenario-aware policy completes 40/40 tasks, with a 95% Wilson interval [0.912, 1.000]. Replacing its final message with unrelated text also completes 40/40, with the same Wilson interval, exposing a message-content gap. A simulated control ablation varies independent omissions of verification and messaging. At omission probability 0.5, simulated completion changes from 0.234 [0.197, 0.266] without forced steps to 1.000 [1.000, 1.000] with both steps forced; brackets show 95% seed-bootstrap intervals. All 13760 local episodes include repeated runs with identical semantic traces. These results test the evaluation design, not learned models, customer satisfaction, or deployment safety.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23752383
Primary Topic
Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Apology Pizza: Measuring Bounded Remedies in Customer Support

Pooria Arab
2 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
preprint

Apology Pizza: Measuring Bounded Remedies in Customer Support

Pooria Arab
preprint en

Abstract

Customer support agents can offer polite text while taking the wrong financial action. Apology Pizza measures bounded remedy execution on 40 synthetic complaints across 8 scenario classes. We evaluate 12 scripted controls through the live tool environment and replay grader. A scenario-aware policy completes 40/40 tasks, with a 95% Wilson interval [0.912, 1.000]. Replacing its final message with unrelated text also completes 40/40, with the same Wilson interval, exposing a message-content gap. A simulated control ablation varies independent omissions of verification and messaging. At omission probability 0.5, simulated completion changes from 0.234 [0.197, 0.266] without forced steps to 1.000 [1.000, 1.000] with both steps forced; brackets show 95% seed-bootstrap intervals. All 13760 local episodes include repeated runs with identical semantic traces. These results test the evaluation design, not learned models, customer satisfaction, or deployment safety.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon