Interaction Between Russian Civil Society and the Social Group of Special Military Operation Participants: Forms of Contact, Barriers, and Social Consequences

The article examines interaction between Russian civil society and the emerging social group of Special Military Operation participants. It uses a secondary analysis of open survey data, institutional reports and academic studies published in 2021–2026. Four levels of interaction are distinguished: institutional, horizontal, symbolic and everyday. Quantitative indicators show a substantial scale of formal support, while everyday integration and stable horizontal ties remain less measurable and less consolidated. The article identifies formalization, role reduction, weak continuity of contacts and fragmented support pathways as key barriers. It argues for a shift from a recipient-oriented model to subject participation in employment, education, volunteering and local civic life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.67931/1998-5533-2026-3-335-339
Primary Topic
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interaction Between Russian Civil Society and the Social Group of Special Military Operation Participants: Forms of Contact, Barriers, and Social Consequences

N. N. Melnikov
3 links
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
article

Interaction Between Russian Civil Society and the Social Group of Special Military Operation Participants: Forms of Contact, Barriers, and Social Consequences

N. N. Melnikov
article en

Abstract

The article examines interaction between Russian civil society and the emerging social group of Special Military Operation participants. It uses a secondary analysis of open survey data, institutional reports and academic studies published in 2021–2026. Four levels of interaction are distinguished: institutional, horizontal, symbolic and everyday. Quantitative indicators show a substantial scale of formal support, while everyday integration and stable horizontal ties remain less measurable and less consolidated. The article identifies formalization, role reduction, weak continuity of contacts and fragmented support pathways as key barriers. It argues for a shift from a recipient-oriented model to subject participation in employment, education, volunteering and local civic life.

(3)
Saint Petersburg State Forest Technical University (RU)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon