Exploring the Acceptance and Integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Nursing Education: Perspectives of Nurse Educators

This qualitative descriptive study explored how nurse educators at Olivarez College Tagaytay, Cavite, accepted and integrated generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in nursing education and developed an evidence-informed action plan. Eight purposively selected nurse educators who had used GenAI in teaching participated in semi-structured, in-depth interviews during August 2026. The interview guide was expert-validated, and recordings were transcribed and examined through Braun and Clarke’s six-phase thematic analysis. Data collection occurred in three waves; 125 codes were organized into six themes and 16 subthemes. The themes were unplanned entry into a necessary technology; conditional acceptance anchored in professional judgment; adapting under generational pressure; integration at the preparation stage; safeguarding learning through vigilance and assessment redesign; and enablement by leadership without written policy. Educators perceived GenAI as useful for preparing lessons, cases, questions, and simplified learning materials but insisted on verifying outputs and protecting clinical judgment, empathy, academic integrity, and patient safety. Integration remained largely preparatory and individualized, while participants described uneven digital confidence, assessment vulnerabilities, personal subscription costs, and the absence of consistent written rules despite administrative encouragement. The findings indicate a gap between conditional acceptance and systematic pedagogical integration. A five-component action plan addressing governance, differentiated faculty development, assessment integrity, student AI literacy, and technical access was proposed, not evaluated. The study contributes institution-specific evidence to responsible GenAI adoption in nursing education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23767178
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Acceptance and Integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Nursing Education: Perspectives of Nurse Educators

Joseph Michael Manlutac, Ryan Joseph Filart
7 links
International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Exploring the Acceptance and Integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Nursing Education: Perspectives of Nurse Educators

Joseph Michael Manlutac, Ryan Joseph Filart
article en

Abstract

This qualitative descriptive study explored how nurse educators at Olivarez College Tagaytay, Cavite, accepted and integrated generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in nursing education and developed an evidence-informed action plan. Eight purposively selected nurse educators who had used GenAI in teaching participated in semi-structured, in-depth interviews during August 2026. The interview guide was expert-validated, and recordings were transcribed and examined through Braun and Clarke’s six-phase thematic analysis. Data collection occurred in three waves; 125 codes were organized into six themes and 16 subthemes. The themes were unplanned entry into a necessary technology; conditional acceptance anchored in professional judgment; adapting under generational pressure; integration at the preparation stage; safeguarding learning through vigilance and assessment redesign; and enablement by leadership without written policy. Educators perceived GenAI as useful for preparing lessons, cases, questions, and simplified learning materials but insisted on verifying outputs and protecting clinical judgment, empathy, academic integrity, and patient safety. Integration remained largely preparatory and individualized, while participants described uneven digital confidence, assessment vulnerabilities, personal subscription costs, and the absence of consistent written rules despite administrative encouragement. The findings indicate a gap between conditional acceptance and systematic pedagogical integration. A five-component action plan addressing governance, differentiated faculty development, assessment integrity, student AI literacy, and technical access was proposed, not evaluated. The study contributes institution-specific evidence to responsible GenAI adoption in nursing education.

International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives
Wesleyan University Philippines (PH)
Quality education, Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon