Effects of Specimen Size and Loading Boundary on the Strength Evaluation of Cemented Phosphate Tailings Backfill and Corresponding Correction Methods

Specimen size and loading boundary conditions affect the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) measured for cemented backfill and hinder direct comparison among test configurations. Cubic cemented phosphate tailings backfill specimens (40–200 mm) were tested at 3, 7, 14, and 28 d; 200 mm specimens were also subjected to partial loading at contact-area ratios η of 0.063–1.000. The mixture had a binder-to-tailings ratio of 1:8 and a slurry mass concentration of 68%. Using the 70.7 mm specimen and full-section loading as references, size- and loading-boundary correction coefficients, Ks and Kc, were defined. At 3 d, Ks for the 200 mm specimen was 0.394; at 7 and 14 d, Ks ranged from 0.709 to 1.114 and 0.889 to 1.000, respectively. At 28 d, the 100–200 mm specimens exceeded the reference-group point estimate, while the reference group had a coefficient of variation of 41.1%, indicating an apparent response affected by curing boundary and variability. As η decreased, peak load and full-section equivalent strength decreased, whereas area-averaged nominal contact stress increased; at 28 d and η = 0.063, Kc = 0.105 and the nominal contact stress was 9.080 MPa. Qualitative COMSOL comparisons and exploratory data-driven analysis supported physical interpretation and variable-sensitivity assessment. These coefficients improve comparability under matched conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Minerals
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/min16111121
Primary Topic
Tailings Management and Properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Specimen Size and Loading Boundary on the Strength Evaluation of Cemented Phosphate Tailings Backfill and Corresponding Correction Methods

Yalei Zhe, Sun Huafen, Hou Kepeng, Yanlin Li et al.
1 links
Minerals
Tailings Management and Properties
article

Effects of Specimen Size and Loading Boundary on the Strength Evaluation of Cemented Phosphate Tailings Backfill and Corresponding Correction Methods

Yalei Zhe, Sun Huafen, Hou Kepeng, Yanlin Li, Yubang Li, Hui RAO, Guoliang Wen
article en

Abstract

Specimen size and loading boundary conditions affect the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) measured for cemented backfill and hinder direct comparison among test configurations. Cubic cemented phosphate tailings backfill specimens (40–200 mm) were tested at 3, 7, 14, and 28 d; 200 mm specimens were also subjected to partial loading at contact-area ratios η of 0.063–1.000. The mixture had a binder-to-tailings ratio of 1:8 and a slurry mass concentration of 68%. Using the 70.7 mm specimen and full-section loading as references, size- and loading-boundary correction coefficients, Ks and Kc, were defined. At 3 d, Ks for the 200 mm specimen was 0.394; at 7 and 14 d, Ks ranged from 0.709 to 1.114 and 0.889 to 1.000, respectively. At 28 d, the 100–200 mm specimens exceeded the reference-group point estimate, while the reference group had a coefficient of variation of 41.1%, indicating an apparent response affected by curing boundary and variability. As η decreased, peak load and full-section equivalent strength decreased, whereas area-averaged nominal contact stress increased; at 28 d and η = 0.063, Kc = 0.105 and the nominal contact stress was 9.080 MPa. Qualitative COMSOL comparisons and exploratory data-driven analysis supported physical interpretation and variable-sensitivity assessment. These coefficients improve comparability under matched conditions.

MineralsVol. 16(11)
Kunming University of Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Tailings Management and Properties
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon