AI-Driven Precision Irrigation in High-Density Apple Orchards: Comparative Analysis of Water Application, Soil Moisture Dynamics, and Fruit Yield

Inefficient Irrigation practices in agriculture systems has encouraged the development of sensor-based irrigation systems to increase resource use efficiency and profitability. However, comparisons between automated and manual drip-irrigation systems must consider treatment effects as well as the volume of water applied. This study was conducted at Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, India. The study included 182 soil-moisture readings recorded over a 100-day period (15 June to 14 August 2021), together with irrigation data, namely the mode of drip-irrigation application (manual or automatic) and the volume of water applied in litres per irrigation event. The records contained 18 automatic irrigation events totaling 79,090 Litres and 36 manual events totaling 126,720 Litres, representing a 37.59% reduction in recorded irrigation water under automatic drip irrigation compared with manual drip irrigation. The system used three identical, indigenously developed soil-moisture sensors installed at a depth of 15 cm in the experimental plot having clay loam soil type. The mean of the three moisture-sensor readings was 54.96%, with a standard deviation of 18.45 percentage points. Soil moisture and relative humidity were positively correlated (ρ = 0.360, p < 0.001). The Random Forest Machine-Learning Model achieved a mean absolute error of 6.34 percentage points, compared with 10.74 percentage points for the persistence method. Harvested yields were 62.5 versus 36.8 kg for Golden Apple, 46.0 versus 22.7 kg for Decoste Robinjin, and 54.0 versus 28.75 kg for Mitch Gala (automated versus manual; five trees per irrigation mode and variety). These values represent descriptive increases in harvested mass of 69.84%, 102.64% and 87.83%, respectively, relative to manual irrigation. Normalized yield-water response scenarios over the 100-day period illustrate potential improvements in water management. The study suggests that predictive irrigation is feasible and provides data relevant to evaluating irrigation volumes, water-use efficiency and crop yield for resource use efficiency and profitability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Plant & Soil Science
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2026/v38i106392
Primary Topic
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-Driven Precision Irrigation in High-Density Apple Orchards: Comparative Analysis of Water Application, Soil Moisture Dynamics, and Fruit Yield

Vijay Pal Singh, Riyaz Ashraf, Rohitashw Kumar
2 links
International Journal of Plant & Soil Science
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
article

AI-Driven Precision Irrigation in High-Density Apple Orchards: Comparative Analysis of Water Application, Soil Moisture Dynamics, and Fruit Yield

Vijay Pal Singh, Riyaz Ashraf, Rohitashw Kumar
article en

Abstract

Inefficient Irrigation practices in agriculture systems has encouraged the development of sensor-based irrigation systems to increase resource use efficiency and profitability. However, comparisons between automated and manual drip-irrigation systems must consider treatment effects as well as the volume of water applied. This study was conducted at Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, India. The study included 182 soil-moisture readings recorded over a 100-day period (15 June to 14 August 2021), together with irrigation data, namely the mode of drip-irrigation application (manual or automatic) and the volume of water applied in litres per irrigation event. The records contained 18 automatic irrigation events totaling 79,090 Litres and 36 manual events totaling 126,720 Litres, representing a 37.59% reduction in recorded irrigation water under automatic drip irrigation compared with manual drip irrigation. The system used three identical, indigenously developed soil-moisture sensors installed at a depth of 15 cm in the experimental plot having clay loam soil type. The mean of the three moisture-sensor readings was 54.96%, with a standard deviation of 18.45 percentage points. Soil moisture and relative humidity were positively correlated (ρ = 0.360, p < 0.001). The Random Forest Machine-Learning Model achieved a mean absolute error of 6.34 percentage points, compared with 10.74 percentage points for the persistence method. Harvested yields were 62.5 versus 36.8 kg for Golden Apple, 46.0 versus 22.7 kg for Decoste Robinjin, and 54.0 versus 28.75 kg for Mitch Gala (automated versus manual; five trees per irrigation mode and variety). These values represent descriptive increases in harvested mass of 69.84%, 102.64% and 87.83%, respectively, relative to manual irrigation. Normalized yield-water response scenarios over the 100-day period illustrate potential improvements in water management. The study suggests that predictive irrigation is feasible and provides data relevant to evaluating irrigation volumes, water-use efficiency and crop yield for resource use efficiency and profitability.

International Journal of Plant & Soil ScienceVol. 38(10)
Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir (IN), Texas A&M University (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon