Translation education in the age of AI: technics, externalized linguistic memory, and attentional governance

This study draws on Bernard Stiegler’s philosophy of technics to explore how AI reshapes the cognitive and pedagogical conditions of translation education in university settings. Moving beyond a view of AI as a supplementary tool, it argues that AI reconfigures the cognitive ecology of translation learning by altering the relationship among internalized knowledge, externalized linguistic memory, and attention. In AI-mediated translation workflows, textual quality alone no longer provides sufficient evidence of learners’ competence or cognitive engagement. The study therefore identifies attentional governance as a central dimension of translation competence, emphasizing how human scrutiny is directed, adjusted, intensified, and justified across such workflows. It further proposes workflow-based assessment that examines prompting, verification, revision, and justification alongside the final text. By framing translation education as a pharmacological practice, the article shows how pedagogical design can manage the benefits and risks of AI while sustaining interpretive agency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia Pacific Translation and Intercultural Studies
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23306343.2026.2756905
Primary Topic
Translation Studies and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Translation education in the age of AI: technics, externalized linguistic memory, and attentional governance

Sang-Bin Lee
4 links
Asia Pacific Translation and Intercultural Studies
Translation Studies and Practices
article

Translation education in the age of AI: technics, externalized linguistic memory, and attentional governance

Sang-Bin Lee
article en

Abstract

This study draws on Bernard Stiegler’s philosophy of technics to explore how AI reshapes the cognitive and pedagogical conditions of translation education in university settings. Moving beyond a view of AI as a supplementary tool, it argues that AI reconfigures the cognitive ecology of translation learning by altering the relationship among internalized knowledge, externalized linguistic memory, and attention. In AI-mediated translation workflows, textual quality alone no longer provides sufficient evidence of learners’ competence or cognitive engagement. The study therefore identifies attentional governance as a central dimension of translation competence, emphasizing how human scrutiny is directed, adjusted, intensified, and justified across such workflows. It further proposes workflow-based assessment that examines prompting, verification, revision, and justification alongside the final text. By framing translation education as a pharmacological practice, the article shows how pedagogical design can manage the benefits and risks of AI while sustaining interpretive agency.

Asia Pacific Translation and Intercultural Studies
Hankuk University of Foreign Studies (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Translation Studies and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon