The politics of refugee labelling in Cold War France: from the myth of difference between past and present refugees to the transformation of labelling practices

This article analyses the determination of refugee status in France during the Cold War, showing that selection was disconnected from individual persecution claims. Recognition depended primarily on national group membership, shaped by ideological, political, economic and social considerations alongside ethnic stereotypes. Examining the interplay between state interests, institutional staffing and refugee categorisation, the article contests the ‘myth of difference’ legitimising restrictive asylum policies today. This myth falsely constructs contemporary Southern asylum seekers as fundamentally distinct from - and less authentic than - Cold War European refugees, obscuring historical continuities in how political and economic factors drive refugee recognition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cold War History
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14682745.2026.2635713
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The politics of refugee labelling in Cold War France: from the myth of difference between past and present refugees to the transformation of labelling practices

Karen Akoka
Cold War History
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
article

The politics of refugee labelling in Cold War France: from the myth of difference between past and present refugees to the transformation of labelling practices

Karen Akoka
article en

Abstract

This article analyses the determination of refugee status in France during the Cold War, showing that selection was disconnected from individual persecution claims. Recognition depended primarily on national group membership, shaped by ideological, political, economic and social considerations alongside ethnic stereotypes. Examining the interplay between state interests, institutional staffing and refugee categorisation, the article contests the ‘myth of difference’ legitimising restrictive asylum policies today. This myth falsely constructs contemporary Southern asylum seekers as fundamentally distinct from - and less authentic than - Cold War European refugees, obscuring historical continuities in how political and economic factors drive refugee recognition.

Cold War History
Université Paris Nanterre (FR), Institut des Sciences Sociales du Politique (FR)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon