Cultural Heritage Recognition, Spatial Accumulation and Dynamics: An Institutional Spatial Perspective on Sustainable Spatial Planning in Fujian, China

Cultural heritage spatial patterns reflect both the long-term accumulation of historical resources and their successive recognition within national heritage protection systems. Here, the recognition year specifically refers to the time when a heritage resource was incorporated into the national protection system, rather than the period when the heritage itself was formed. Existing studies have extensively examined heritage distribution and spatiotemporal evolution, but rarely treat successive recognition batches as a time-ordered institutional spatial sequence. Taking four national-level heritage types in Fujian, China—Chinese Traditional Villages (CTVs), National Key Cultural Relic Protection Units (NKCRPUs), National Intangible Cultural Heritage (NICH), and Chinese Historical and Cultural Towns (CHCTs)—this study constructs cumulative recognition spatial sequences from recognition batches and examines overall spatial patterns, cumulative spatial dynamics, and inter-type spatial associations. The results show that: (1) CTVs, NKCRPUs, and NICH exhibit significant clustering, whereas CHCTs do not show a statistically significant departure from random distribution when a common study area is used, with high-density cores mainly concentrated in coastal areas; (2) CTVs and NICH show relatively strong spatial persistence, NKCRPUs transition from early expansion to stable extension, and CHCTs show more pronounced restructuring followed by stabilization, although their small sample size limits the robustness of this result; and (3) spatial associations among heritage types are scale-dependent, with positive associations between CTVs–CHCTs and NKCRPUs–NICH, while other pairs show weaker or more localized associations. A benchmark analysis further shows that the stabilization in later stages is largely consistent with the cumulative design, with only limited evidence for genuine stage-specific spatial adjustment. By transforming recognition batches into time-sequenced spatial data, this study reveals cumulative, expansion, and restructuring processes that static heritage inventories cannot capture, providing a spatial basis for identifying potential cultural heritage clusters and spatially connected heritage combinations, thereby supporting sustainable spatial planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/land15112061
Primary Topic
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cultural Heritage Recognition, Spatial Accumulation and Dynamics: An Institutional Spatial Perspective on Sustainable Spatial Planning in Fujian, China

Kaida Chen, Ziyuan Liu, Xiaodong Wang
8 links
Land
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
article

Cultural Heritage Recognition, Spatial Accumulation and Dynamics: An Institutional Spatial Perspective on Sustainable Spatial Planning in Fujian, China

Kaida Chen, Ziyuan Liu, Xiaodong Wang
article en

Abstract

Cultural heritage spatial patterns reflect both the long-term accumulation of historical resources and their successive recognition within national heritage protection systems. Here, the recognition year specifically refers to the time when a heritage resource was incorporated into the national protection system, rather than the period when the heritage itself was formed. Existing studies have extensively examined heritage distribution and spatiotemporal evolution, but rarely treat successive recognition batches as a time-ordered institutional spatial sequence. Taking four national-level heritage types in Fujian, China—Chinese Traditional Villages (CTVs), National Key Cultural Relic Protection Units (NKCRPUs), National Intangible Cultural Heritage (NICH), and Chinese Historical and Cultural Towns (CHCTs)—this study constructs cumulative recognition spatial sequences from recognition batches and examines overall spatial patterns, cumulative spatial dynamics, and inter-type spatial associations. The results show that: (1) CTVs, NKCRPUs, and NICH exhibit significant clustering, whereas CHCTs do not show a statistically significant departure from random distribution when a common study area is used, with high-density cores mainly concentrated in coastal areas; (2) CTVs and NICH show relatively strong spatial persistence, NKCRPUs transition from early expansion to stable extension, and CHCTs show more pronounced restructuring followed by stabilization, although their small sample size limits the robustness of this result; and (3) spatial associations among heritage types are scale-dependent, with positive associations between CTVs–CHCTs and NKCRPUs–NICH, while other pairs show weaker or more localized associations. A benchmark analysis further shows that the stabilization in later stages is largely consistent with the cumulative design, with only limited evidence for genuine stage-specific spatial adjustment. By transforming recognition batches into time-sequenced spatial data, this study reveals cumulative, expansion, and restructuring processes that static heritage inventories cannot capture, providing a spatial basis for identifying potential cultural heritage clusters and spatially connected heritage combinations, thereby supporting sustainable spatial planning.

LandVol. 15(11)
Jimei University (CN), Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon