The impact of cultural and religious codes on the inclusive employment process of intellectually disabled adults in Türkiye

This study examines how cultural and religious codes shape the way support and administrative staff talk about an intellectually disabled colleague at a Turkish university in a region where local culture and Islamic values are intertwined. Nine staff members participated in semi-structured interviews. Consistent with the social model, the object of analysis is the disabling environment, not the employee. Lacking professional experience, staff compensated with religious references such as ‘God’s trust’ and ‘our test’, rendering the disabled employee an object ‘in need of help’. This pity discourse treats a colleague as an object of care rather than an equal, legitimises compassionate yet exclusionary attitudes, and undermines his institutional belonging. His own comment on the findings was a request for a say in decisions about his work, which no colleague had raised. The article sets out concrete steps through which disabled employees can hold institutions to equality-based structural and discursive change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Disability & Society
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2026.2753111
Primary Topic
Disability Education and Employment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of cultural and religious codes on the inclusive employment process of intellectually disabled adults in Türkiye

Oğuzhan Hazır
Disability & Society
Disability Education and Employment
article

The impact of cultural and religious codes on the inclusive employment process of intellectually disabled adults in Türkiye

Oğuzhan Hazır
article en

Abstract

This study examines how cultural and religious codes shape the way support and administrative staff talk about an intellectually disabled colleague at a Turkish university in a region where local culture and Islamic values are intertwined. Nine staff members participated in semi-structured interviews. Consistent with the social model, the object of analysis is the disabling environment, not the employee. Lacking professional experience, staff compensated with religious references such as ‘God’s trust’ and ‘our test’, rendering the disabled employee an object ‘in need of help’. This pity discourse treats a colleague as an object of care rather than an equal, legitimises compassionate yet exclusionary attitudes, and undermines his institutional belonging. His own comment on the findings was a request for a say in decisions about his work, which no colleague had raised. The article sets out concrete steps through which disabled employees can hold institutions to equality-based structural and discursive change.

Disability & Society
Atatürk University (TR)
Reduced inequalities, Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Disability Education and Employment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon