INDEPENDENCE OF THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA

The independence of the Election Commission of India is central to free and fair elections and public confidence in constitutional democracy. Article 324 of the Constitution vests the Commission with the superintendence, direction and control of elections. The appointment process has nevertheless raised questions about executive influence and institutional neutrality. In Anoop Baranwal v. Union of India (2023), the Supreme Court prescribed an interim selection committee comprising the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition and the Chief Justice of India until Parliament enacted a law. The Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023 subsequently established a different statutory committee. In the context of reported Cockroach Janata Party protests concerning electoral-roll revisions and demands for institutional accountability, this paper examines the constitutional implications of the appointment framework. It proposes a politically balanced and transparent selection process, published merit criteria, accessible voter remedies and stronger procedural accountability.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23761109
Primary Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

INDEPENDENCE OF THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA

Roshani Pandey, Hemant Kumar Kharol
3 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
article

INDEPENDENCE OF THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA

Roshani Pandey, Hemant Kumar Kharol
article en

Abstract

The independence of the Election Commission of India is central to free and fair elections and public confidence in constitutional democracy. Article 324 of the Constitution vests the Commission with the superintendence, direction and control of elections. The appointment process has nevertheless raised questions about executive influence and institutional neutrality. In Anoop Baranwal v. Union of India (2023), the Supreme Court prescribed an interim selection committee comprising the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition and the Chief Justice of India until Parliament enacted a law. The Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023 subsequently established a different statutory committee. In the context of reported Cockroach Janata Party protests concerning electoral-roll revisions and demands for institutional accountability, this paper examines the constitutional implications of the appointment framework. It proposes a politically balanced and transparent selection process, published merit criteria, accessible voter remedies and stronger procedural accountability.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
INDEPENDENCE OF THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA — Roshani Pandey, Hemant Kumar Kharol · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS