From Identity to Monetization: Governing Digital Royalty Management through Digital Identity in Indonesia

Platform-economy royalty systems still rely on fragmented metadata, intermediary-controlled databases, and Digital Rights Management (DRM) systems designed mainly for access control and copyright enforcement. Inconsistent attribution, delayed payments, and limited interoperability therefore persist. This article proposes a Digital Royalty Management Model, a governance framework grounded in Digital Identity and digital trust infrastructures. Its architecture links Subject Identity, Digital Object Identity, Rights and Entitlements, Licensing and Authorization, Provenance and Usage, Royalty Entitlement and Allocation, and Payment and Remuneration. Legally, identity assurance can support verifiable coordination of rights-related relationships without substituting for substantive copyright law. Using a qualitative, normative, conceptual, comparative, and socio-technical approach, the article examines the United States, China, the European Union, and Indonesia. The United States illustrates sector-specific institutional centralization; China, state-recognized identity and provenance governance; the European Union, interoperable and legally recognized trust services; and Indonesia, a transition combining centralized royalty administration with emerging Digital Identity infrastructure. Indonesia is a critical test case: its One Gate Policy and Digital Identity and electronic-trust framework have developed simultaneously. The principal challenge is not whether royalty governance should be centralized or decentralized, but whether identity, content, rights, authorization, usage, and payment remain reliably connected across organizational and platform boundaries. Sustainable governance therefore requires aligning institutional authority with interoperable trust infrastructure while preserving the distinction between identity assurance and substantive rights determination. Unlike conventional DRM, which governs access, and blockchain-based systems, which automate transactions, the model treats Digital Identity as a cross-platform trust layer connecting subject, object, rights, authorization, usage, and remuneration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hasanuddin Law Review
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.65844/2442-9899.1266
Primary Topic
Digital Rights Management and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Identity to Monetization: Governing Digital Royalty Management through Digital Identity in Indonesia

Nadirsyah Hosen, Brian Amy Prastyo, Hamzah Halim, Edmon Makarim
3 links
Hasanuddin Law Review
Digital Rights Management and Security
article

From Identity to Monetization: Governing Digital Royalty Management through Digital Identity in Indonesia

Nadirsyah Hosen, Brian Amy Prastyo, Hamzah Halim, Edmon Makarim
article en

Abstract

Platform-economy royalty systems still rely on fragmented metadata, intermediary-controlled databases, and Digital Rights Management (DRM) systems designed mainly for access control and copyright enforcement. Inconsistent attribution, delayed payments, and limited interoperability therefore persist. This article proposes a Digital Royalty Management Model, a governance framework grounded in Digital Identity and digital trust infrastructures. Its architecture links Subject Identity, Digital Object Identity, Rights and Entitlements, Licensing and Authorization, Provenance and Usage, Royalty Entitlement and Allocation, and Payment and Remuneration. Legally, identity assurance can support verifiable coordination of rights-related relationships without substituting for substantive copyright law. Using a qualitative, normative, conceptual, comparative, and socio-technical approach, the article examines the United States, China, the European Union, and Indonesia. The United States illustrates sector-specific institutional centralization; China, state-recognized identity and provenance governance; the European Union, interoperable and legally recognized trust services; and Indonesia, a transition combining centralized royalty administration with emerging Digital Identity infrastructure. Indonesia is a critical test case: its One Gate Policy and Digital Identity and electronic-trust framework have developed simultaneously. The principal challenge is not whether royalty governance should be centralized or decentralized, but whether identity, content, rights, authorization, usage, and payment remain reliably connected across organizational and platform boundaries. Sustainable governance therefore requires aligning institutional authority with interoperable trust infrastructure while preserving the distinction between identity assurance and substantive rights determination. Unlike conventional DRM, which governs access, and blockchain-based systems, which automate transactions, the model treats Digital Identity as a cross-platform trust layer connecting subject, object, rights, authorization, usage, and remuneration.

Hasanuddin Law ReviewVol. 12(2)
The University of Melbourne (AU), University of Indonesia (ID), Hasanuddin University (ID)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Digital Rights Management and Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon