Quadriceps Femoris Versus Lumbar Paraspinal Soft Tissue Mobilization in Patients with Low Back Pain Associated with Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Backgroundand Objectives: Soft tissue mobilization is commonly used to manage low back pain (LBP), but it remains unclear whether treatment outcomes differ according to the anatomical region targeted. To compare the effects of soft tissue mobilization applied to the quadriceps femoris and lumbar paraspinal muscles on pain intensity, anterior pelvic tilt, lumbar flexion excursion, and disability in patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) presenting with chronic LBP and quadriceps femoris shortening. Materials and Methods: Parallel-group randomized controlled trial. Forty participants were randomly assigned to either quadriceps femoris or lumbar paraspinal soft tissue mobilization (n = 20 per group). Both groups received soft tissue mobilization twice weekly for 4 weeks. Pain intensity, anterior pelvic tilt, lumbar flexion excursion, and disability were assessed at baseline and post-intervention. The primary analysis followed the intention-to-treat principle using linear mixed models with all available observations. Results: Pain intensity and disability decreased in both groups, without significant between-group differences in change. For pain intensity, the estimated between-group difference was −0.39 points (95% CI, −0.91 to 0.13; p = 0.143), and for disability, it was −2.76 percentage points (95% CI, −7.55 to 2.04; p = 0.260). Significant group × time interactions were observed for anterior pelvic tilt (between-group difference, −2.79°; 95% CI, −3.24 to −2.34) and lumbar flexion excursion (between-group difference, 1.01 cm; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.19), favoring the quadriceps femoris group (both p < 0.001). Conclusions: Pain intensity and disability improved over time following both soft tissue mobilization protocols, without significant between-group differences. Quadriceps femoris mobilization produced greater short-term improvements in anterior pelvic tilt and lumbar flexion excursion than lumbar paraspinal mobilization. These findings suggest that quadriceps femoris mobilization may provide additional benefits for movement-related outcomes in patients with LDH presenting with LBP and quadriceps femoris shortening.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62112101
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quadriceps Femoris Versus Lumbar Paraspinal Soft Tissue Mobilization in Patients with Low Back Pain Associated with Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Haneul Lee, Kangho Woo
4 links
Medicina
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Quadriceps Femoris Versus Lumbar Paraspinal Soft Tissue Mobilization in Patients with Low Back Pain Associated with Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Haneul Lee, Kangho Woo
article en

Abstract

Backgroundand Objectives: Soft tissue mobilization is commonly used to manage low back pain (LBP), but it remains unclear whether treatment outcomes differ according to the anatomical region targeted. To compare the effects of soft tissue mobilization applied to the quadriceps femoris and lumbar paraspinal muscles on pain intensity, anterior pelvic tilt, lumbar flexion excursion, and disability in patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) presenting with chronic LBP and quadriceps femoris shortening. Materials and Methods: Parallel-group randomized controlled trial. Forty participants were randomly assigned to either quadriceps femoris or lumbar paraspinal soft tissue mobilization (n = 20 per group). Both groups received soft tissue mobilization twice weekly for 4 weeks. Pain intensity, anterior pelvic tilt, lumbar flexion excursion, and disability were assessed at baseline and post-intervention. The primary analysis followed the intention-to-treat principle using linear mixed models with all available observations. Results: Pain intensity and disability decreased in both groups, without significant between-group differences in change. For pain intensity, the estimated between-group difference was −0.39 points (95% CI, −0.91 to 0.13; p = 0.143), and for disability, it was −2.76 percentage points (95% CI, −7.55 to 2.04; p = 0.260). Significant group × time interactions were observed for anterior pelvic tilt (between-group difference, −2.79°; 95% CI, −3.24 to −2.34) and lumbar flexion excursion (between-group difference, 1.01 cm; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.19), favoring the quadriceps femoris group (both p < 0.001). Conclusions: Pain intensity and disability improved over time following both soft tissue mobilization protocols, without significant between-group differences. Quadriceps femoris mobilization produced greater short-term improvements in anterior pelvic tilt and lumbar flexion excursion than lumbar paraspinal mobilization. These findings suggest that quadriceps femoris mobilization may provide additional benefits for movement-related outcomes in patients with LDH presenting with LBP and quadriceps femoris shortening.

MedicinaVol. 62(11)
Gachon University (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon