From objects and processes to categories

Abstract This study proposes a metonymic account of Mandarin classifierization by reframing it as a profile shift, thereby challenging prevailing metaphorical analyses. An investigation of denominal ( tiáo vs. gēn ) and deverbal ( zhāng vs. bǎ ) pairs reveals that both denominal and deverbal classifierization are rooted in metonymic chaining yet pivot on distinct operations. Denominal classifierization involves dereferentialization, which backgrounds physical thinghood via two-member chains. Conversely, deverbal classifierization requires a more extensive chain to reconcile the tension between process and property through atemporalization. However, they converge on a dynamic salient property matrix, from which nouns recruit specific dimensions for conceptual alignment. Thus, the semantic relationship between a classifier and its associated nouns is metonymic. As a corollary, matrix dimensionality and chain complexity indicate degrees of metonymicity, situating classifiers along the lexical-functional continuum. The present study yields a unified account of the cognitive mechanisms underlying the re-profiling of nouns and verbs as classifiers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.26007.che
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From objects and processes to categories

Zaijiang Wei, Lixia Chen
1 links
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
article

From objects and processes to categories

Zaijiang Wei, Lixia Chen
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study proposes a metonymic account of Mandarin classifierization by reframing it as a profile shift, thereby challenging prevailing metaphorical analyses. An investigation of denominal ( tiáo vs. gēn ) and deverbal ( zhāng vs. bǎ ) pairs reveals that both denominal and deverbal classifierization are rooted in metonymic chaining yet pivot on distinct operations. Denominal classifierization involves dereferentialization, which backgrounds physical thinghood via two-member chains. Conversely, deverbal classifierization requires a more extensive chain to reconcile the tension between process and property through atemporalization. However, they converge on a dynamic salient property matrix, from which nouns recruit specific dimensions for conceptual alignment. Thus, the semantic relationship between a classifier and its associated nouns is metonymic. As a corollary, matrix dimensionality and chain complexity indicate degrees of metonymicity, situating classifiers along the lexical-functional continuum. The present study yields a unified account of the cognitive mechanisms underlying the re-profiling of nouns and verbs as classifiers.

Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Guangdong University of Foreign Studies (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
From objects and processes to categories — Zaijiang Wei, Lixia Chen · Review of Cognitive Linguistics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS