“As With the Stroke of an Enchanter’s Wand”: Marx on National Debt and the State

This paper examines Marx’s argument concerning national debt and the state. Marx thought national debt a central lever of primitive accumulation, and he saw it as a force that had not only served to create the conditions for the rise of capitalism, but also as something that would ultimately cause the dissolution of the state itself. The article places Marx’s account of state finance in the tradition of anti-financial writings, and particularly of eighteenth-century republican denunciations of finance. Republican critics of finance feared the power it would accord to central authorities, just as they feared the fictitious and imaginary nature of such speculative wealth. Marx understood better than many eighteenth-century critics of finance the dual role that national debt played, both strengthening the state (by affording it the capacity to pay for outsized military power) and weakening it (by subjecting it to the rule of financiers). His was thus an extremely insightful account of the paradoxical power of national finance. However, when he began to consider the ways in which a post-capitalist collectivity would be organized, his thought tended to fall back into the types of anti-financial rhetoric that was so central to eighteenth-century republican writers. The paper concludes by suggesting the need for a radical rethinking of the relationship between collective agency and collective debt.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polity
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/744068
Primary Topic
Political Economy and Marxism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“As With the Stroke of an Enchanter’s Wand”: Marx on National Debt and the State

Robert Alan Sparling
Polity
Political Economy and Marxism
article

“As With the Stroke of an Enchanter’s Wand”: Marx on National Debt and the State

Robert Alan Sparling
article en

Abstract

This paper examines Marx’s argument concerning national debt and the state. Marx thought national debt a central lever of primitive accumulation, and he saw it as a force that had not only served to create the conditions for the rise of capitalism, but also as something that would ultimately cause the dissolution of the state itself. The article places Marx’s account of state finance in the tradition of anti-financial writings, and particularly of eighteenth-century republican denunciations of finance. Republican critics of finance feared the power it would accord to central authorities, just as they feared the fictitious and imaginary nature of such speculative wealth. Marx understood better than many eighteenth-century critics of finance the dual role that national debt played, both strengthening the state (by affording it the capacity to pay for outsized military power) and weakening it (by subjecting it to the rule of financiers). His was thus an extremely insightful account of the paradoxical power of national finance. However, when he began to consider the ways in which a post-capitalist collectivity would be organized, his thought tended to fall back into the types of anti-financial rhetoric that was so central to eighteenth-century republican writers. The paper concludes by suggesting the need for a radical rethinking of the relationship between collective agency and collective debt.

Polity
University of Ottawa (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Political Economy and Marxism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon