The Medal of Honor: Race, Rank, and Recognition in the U.S. Military

Guided by Durkheim’s work on symbolic totems, Omi and Winant’s racial formation theory, and resource allocation theories of institutional discrimination, we examine how race has shaped the distribution of the United States’ highest gallantry award. To do so, we introduce the first cross-conflict dataset of Medal of Honor awards relative to killed and wounded in action (KWIA) by race, alongside new baseline data on combat casualties. Our findings reveal systematic racial disparities. Black service members were excluded entirely from Medal of Honor recognition in World War II, remained severely underrepresented in Korea, and continued to be underrepresented in Vietnam despite retrospective awards. Hispanic/Latino personnel were also substantially underrecognized in Korea and Vietnam, with disparities only partially redressed. In contrast, Asian American and Pacific Islander service members were generally overrepresented relative to combat exposure, with retrospective upgrades dramatically amplifying this pattern, while Native Americans were overrepresented across multiple conflicts. New evidence on posthumous awards and rank reveals cumulative inequalities in symbolic recognition, with Black enlisted soldiers in Vietnam considerably more likely to receive the Medal of Honor only after death than White officers. These findings demonstrate how military honors constitute a site of racial formation through which historical exclusion, retrospective correction, and contemporary recognition shape national narratives of heroism and belonging, with direct policy implications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociology of Race and Ethnicity
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23326492261482128
Primary Topic
Race, History, and American Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Medal of Honor: Race, Rank, and Recognition in the U.S. Military

Anthony C. King, Patrick Bury
2 links
Sociology of Race and Ethnicity
Race, History, and American Society
article

The Medal of Honor: Race, Rank, and Recognition in the U.S. Military

Anthony C. King, Patrick Bury
article en

Abstract

Guided by Durkheim’s work on symbolic totems, Omi and Winant’s racial formation theory, and resource allocation theories of institutional discrimination, we examine how race has shaped the distribution of the United States’ highest gallantry award. To do so, we introduce the first cross-conflict dataset of Medal of Honor awards relative to killed and wounded in action (KWIA) by race, alongside new baseline data on combat casualties. Our findings reveal systematic racial disparities. Black service members were excluded entirely from Medal of Honor recognition in World War II, remained severely underrepresented in Korea, and continued to be underrepresented in Vietnam despite retrospective awards. Hispanic/Latino personnel were also substantially underrecognized in Korea and Vietnam, with disparities only partially redressed. In contrast, Asian American and Pacific Islander service members were generally overrepresented relative to combat exposure, with retrospective upgrades dramatically amplifying this pattern, while Native Americans were overrepresented across multiple conflicts. New evidence on posthumous awards and rank reveals cumulative inequalities in symbolic recognition, with Black enlisted soldiers in Vietnam considerably more likely to receive the Medal of Honor only after death than White officers. These findings demonstrate how military honors constitute a site of racial formation through which historical exclusion, retrospective correction, and contemporary recognition shape national narratives of heroism and belonging, with direct policy implications.

Sociology of Race and Ethnicity
University of Exeter (GB), University of Bath (GB)
Arts and Humanities Research Council
Reduced inequalities, Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Race, History, and American Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon