Brand Semantic Governance in AI-Mediated Brand Systems

This working paper develops Brand Semantic Governance as the fourth contribution to the MVB research line and as the semantic layer of Brand Governance in AI-mediated brand systems. The paper addresses a specific governance question: what must remain semantically governable for a brand to be expressed, adapted, distributed, scaled, and evolved without losing continuity? It distinguishes three levels: Governed Brand Semantic Commitments, representing what the organization intentionally commits the brand to represent; Expressed Brand Meaning, representing what decisions and outputs actually express; and Interpreted Brand Meaning, representing what stakeholders construct through exposure, experience, context, and interaction. On this basis, the paper defines Brand Semantic Drift as the progressive, unintended, or unauthorized deviation of Expressed Brand Meaning from Governed Brand Semantic Commitments. It further distinguishes Brand Semantic Drift from Perceptual Drift Risk and Observed Perceptual Drift, and develops the constructs of Meaning Continuity, Brand Semantic Coherence, Semantic Boundaries, Protected Meaning, Controlled Semantic Variables, Change-Eligible Meaning, Category Framing, Promise–Proof Alignment, and Brand Semantic Memory. In AI-mediated environments, generative systems can increase the speed, volume, and fluency of brand outputs without guaranteeing the preservation of semantic commitments. The paper therefore frames semantic continuity as an explicit problem of organizational governance under conditions of distributed decision-making, change, and AI-mediated execution. The central thesis is that organizations cannot govern the meaning audiences ultimately construct; they can govern the semantic commitments and expressions through which they contribute to meaning formation. The paper operates at a conceptual level and does not disclose proprietary tools, scoring systems, semantic maps, prompts, workflows, registry mappings, module routing, or software implementations associated with MVB OS or Pink Different proprietary methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23764347
Primary Topic
Corporate Identity and Reputation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Brand Semantic Governance in AI-Mediated Brand Systems

Daniele Mauro
2 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Corporate Identity and Reputation
article

Brand Semantic Governance in AI-Mediated Brand Systems

Daniele Mauro
article en

Abstract

This working paper develops Brand Semantic Governance as the fourth contribution to the MVB research line and as the semantic layer of Brand Governance in AI-mediated brand systems. The paper addresses a specific governance question: what must remain semantically governable for a brand to be expressed, adapted, distributed, scaled, and evolved without losing continuity? It distinguishes three levels: Governed Brand Semantic Commitments, representing what the organization intentionally commits the brand to represent; Expressed Brand Meaning, representing what decisions and outputs actually express; and Interpreted Brand Meaning, representing what stakeholders construct through exposure, experience, context, and interaction. On this basis, the paper defines Brand Semantic Drift as the progressive, unintended, or unauthorized deviation of Expressed Brand Meaning from Governed Brand Semantic Commitments. It further distinguishes Brand Semantic Drift from Perceptual Drift Risk and Observed Perceptual Drift, and develops the constructs of Meaning Continuity, Brand Semantic Coherence, Semantic Boundaries, Protected Meaning, Controlled Semantic Variables, Change-Eligible Meaning, Category Framing, Promise–Proof Alignment, and Brand Semantic Memory. In AI-mediated environments, generative systems can increase the speed, volume, and fluency of brand outputs without guaranteeing the preservation of semantic commitments. The paper therefore frames semantic continuity as an explicit problem of organizational governance under conditions of distributed decision-making, change, and AI-mediated execution. The central thesis is that organizations cannot govern the meaning audiences ultimately construct; they can govern the semantic commitments and expressions through which they contribute to meaning formation. The paper operates at a conceptual level and does not disclose proprietary tools, scoring systems, semantic maps, prompts, workflows, registry mappings, module routing, or software implementations associated with MVB OS or Pink Different proprietary methods.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Aktion Pink (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Corporate Identity and Reputation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon