Barriers and facilitators to implementing self-management programs for stroke survivors: a systematic review

This systematic review aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators to implementing self-management programs with stroke survivors. Studies describing stroke survivors’, carers’, and health professionals’ perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to implementation in real-world settings were included. Exclusion criteria included publication prior to 2014, conference abstracts, editorials, or non-English publications. MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and grey literature were searched in November 2025. Risk of bias was assessed using the Mixed Methods Assessment Tool. A narrative synthesis, with barriers and facilitators mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, was conducted. Twenty-four studies describing 23 programs were included in the review, including quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods designs. Interventions were implemented across hospital, community, home-based, and online settings. Barriers and facilitators were frequently reported for characteristics of the innovation, in particular the need for flexible and person-centred approaches. Factors related to individuals’ characteristics were also highly reported, including the impact of stroke-related symptoms on participation, the need for social supports, and workforce challenges. The studies included possessed high levels of heterogeneity, limiting the ability to determine the relative importance of barriers and facilitators. Future implementation efforts require consideration of the challenges in sustaining self-management programs long-term. Self-management programs are feasible to implement with stroke survivors across a range of settings, including hospital, community, home-based, and virtual environments.With a range of self-management programs available, clinicians should consider which programs are most suitable to their given context.A flexible and person-centred program is suggested to support a diverse population of stroke survivors to participate and engage.Consideration of how to ensure sustainability within multi-disciplinary teams and resource-constrained services is required. Self-management programs are feasible to implement with stroke survivors across a range of settings, including hospital, community, home-based, and virtual environments. With a range of self-management programs available, clinicians should consider which programs are most suitable to their given context. A flexible and person-centred program is suggested to support a diverse population of stroke survivors to participate and engage. Consideration of how to ensure sustainability within multi-disciplinary teams and resource-constrained services is required.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.34856955
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers and facilitators to implementing self-management programs for stroke survivors: a systematic review

Kate Laver, Madison Chapman, Tamina Levy, Natarsha Emerson et al.
Figshare
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Barriers and facilitators to implementing self-management programs for stroke survivors: a systematic review

Kate Laver, Madison Chapman, Tamina Levy, Natarsha Emerson, Griffin Knight, Andrea Brown, Ruiqi Weng
article en

Abstract

This systematic review aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators to implementing self-management programs with stroke survivors. Studies describing stroke survivors’, carers’, and health professionals’ perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to implementation in real-world settings were included. Exclusion criteria included publication prior to 2014, conference abstracts, editorials, or non-English publications. MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and grey literature were searched in November 2025. Risk of bias was assessed using the Mixed Methods Assessment Tool. A narrative synthesis, with barriers and facilitators mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, was conducted. Twenty-four studies describing 23 programs were included in the review, including quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods designs. Interventions were implemented across hospital, community, home-based, and online settings. Barriers and facilitators were frequently reported for characteristics of the innovation, in particular the need for flexible and person-centred approaches. Factors related to individuals’ characteristics were also highly reported, including the impact of stroke-related symptoms on participation, the need for social supports, and workforce challenges. The studies included possessed high levels of heterogeneity, limiting the ability to determine the relative importance of barriers and facilitators. Future implementation efforts require consideration of the challenges in sustaining self-management programs long-term. Self-management programs are feasible to implement with stroke survivors across a range of settings, including hospital, community, home-based, and virtual environments.With a range of self-management programs available, clinicians should consider which programs are most suitable to their given context.A flexible and person-centred program is suggested to support a diverse population of stroke survivors to participate and engage.Consideration of how to ensure sustainability within multi-disciplinary teams and resource-constrained services is required. Self-management programs are feasible to implement with stroke survivors across a range of settings, including hospital, community, home-based, and virtual environments. With a range of self-management programs available, clinicians should consider which programs are most suitable to their given context. A flexible and person-centred program is suggested to support a diverse population of stroke survivors to participate and engage. Consideration of how to ensure sustainability within multi-disciplinary teams and resource-constrained services is required.

Figshare
Good health and well-being, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon