The Unequal Work of Staying: Reframing Student Agency and Continuation in Higher Education

Conventional retention measures identify whether students remain but reveal little about what remaining requires. Drawing on conceptual development from a mixed-methods doctoral study of students who seriously considered withdrawal but continued, this article advances two interconnected objectives: conceptualising the work of staying and examining how unequal conditions shape its demands. Five interconnected dimensions of staying work are proposed: interpretive, relational, resource-mobilising, adaptive and temporal. The unequal work of staying extends this framework by examining how material, relational, institutional and structural conditions generate disproportionate or avoidable demands that may remain concealed by equivalent retention outcomes. This distinction recognises that differences in effort are not inherently inequitable. The framework connects student agency with institutional responsibility, recognising students’ active participation in continuation while questioning the demands institutions place upon them. Retention practice should therefore support students’ agency while reducing avoidable continuation work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of College Student Retention Research Theory & Practice
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15210251261503297
Primary Topic
Higher Education Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Unequal Work of Staying: Reframing Student Agency and Continuation in Higher Education

Sarah Yearsley
Journal of College Student Retention Research Theory & Practice
Higher Education Research Studies
article

The Unequal Work of Staying: Reframing Student Agency and Continuation in Higher Education

Sarah Yearsley
article en

Abstract

Conventional retention measures identify whether students remain but reveal little about what remaining requires. Drawing on conceptual development from a mixed-methods doctoral study of students who seriously considered withdrawal but continued, this article advances two interconnected objectives: conceptualising the work of staying and examining how unequal conditions shape its demands. Five interconnected dimensions of staying work are proposed: interpretive, relational, resource-mobilising, adaptive and temporal. The unequal work of staying extends this framework by examining how material, relational, institutional and structural conditions generate disproportionate or avoidable demands that may remain concealed by equivalent retention outcomes. This distinction recognises that differences in effort are not inherently inequitable. The framework connects student agency with institutional responsibility, recognising students’ active participation in continuation while questioning the demands institutions place upon them. Retention practice should therefore support students’ agency while reducing avoidable continuation work.

Journal of College Student Retention Research Theory & Practice
Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Higher Education Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
The Unequal Work of Staying: Reframing Student Agency and Continuation in Higher Education — Sarah Yearsley · Journal of College Student Retention Research Theory & Practice (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS