An agentic AI system enhances clinical detection of immune-related adverse events in a multi-phase validation study

Abstract Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) affect up to 40% of patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors, yet identification requires laborious, inconsistent manual chart review. Here we show that agentic artificial intelligence coupled with human verification could enhance efficiency, performance and consistency for irAE assessment. We developed and evaluated an agentic large language model system to extract the presence, temporality, severity grade, attribution and certainty of six irAE types from clinical notes. Retrospectively, the system achieved a macro-averaged F 1 of 0.92 for current-event detection and 0.66 for multi-class severity grading; self-consistency improved F 1 by 0.14. The best-performing configuration cost approximately US$0.02 per note. In prospective silent deployment over 3 months, the binary F 1 was 0.72–0.79. In a randomized crossover study of clinical trial staff, agentic assistance reduced annotation time by 2.71 min ( P < 0.001), increased complete-match accuracy (odds ratio 1.45; 95% confidence interval 1.01–2.08; P = 0.045) and improved interannotator agreement (Krippendorff’s α from 0.22–0.51 to 0.82–0.85).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Cancer
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43018-026-01264-6
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An agentic AI system enhances clinical detection of immune-related adverse events in a multi-phase validation study

Hugo J.W.L. Aerts, Benjamin Harris Kann, Katherine C. Kellogg, Bingxue K. Zhai et al.
4 links
Nature Cancer
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

An agentic AI system enhances clinical detection of immune-related adverse events in a multi-phase validation study

Hugo J.W.L. Aerts, Benjamin Harris Kann, Katherine C. Kellogg, Bingxue K. Zhai, Elad Sharon, Ümit Topaloĝlu, Jonathan Daniel Schoenfeld, Biagio Ricciuti, Jack Gallifant, Danielle S. Bitterman, Jeremy Lyle Warner, Alexander Gusev, Andrew Warrington, Raymond H. Mak, Tanna L. Nelson, Matthew James Hadfield, David Kozono, Harry Hochheiser, Guergana Savova, Paul Catalano, David C. Christiani, Shan Chen, Kee-Young Shin, Patrick F. Doyle, Bingyang Ye, Paul Nguyen, Joyce Guo
article en

Abstract

Abstract Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) affect up to 40% of patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors, yet identification requires laborious, inconsistent manual chart review. Here we show that agentic artificial intelligence coupled with human verification could enhance efficiency, performance and consistency for irAE assessment. We developed and evaluated an agentic large language model system to extract the presence, temporality, severity grade, attribution and certainty of six irAE types from clinical notes. Retrospectively, the system achieved a macro-averaged F 1 of 0.92 for current-event detection and 0.66 for multi-class severity grading; self-consistency improved F 1 by 0.14. The best-performing configuration cost approximately US$0.02 per note. In prospective silent deployment over 3 months, the binary F 1 was 0.72–0.79. In a randomized crossover study of clinical trial staff, agentic assistance reduced annotation time by 2.71 min ( P < 0.001), increased complete-match accuracy (odds ratio 1.45; 95% confidence interval 1.01–2.08; P = 0.045) and improved interannotator agreement (Krippendorff’s α from 0.22–0.51 to 0.82–0.85).

Nature Cancer
Boston Children's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), Brown University (US), Rhode Island Hospital (US), Maastricht University (NL), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center (US), National Cancer Institute (US), Mass General Brigham (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Massachusetts General Hospital, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon