How can multimodality mature into a robust scholarly discipline? A cognitivist's perspective

Further developing multimodality into a respectable discipline requires that its advocates agree about central concepts and about how these concepts must or can be applied to data. Hitherto, multimodality scholarship has been dominated by Social Semiotics, building on Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL). While this approach has spawned many interesting and useful ideas, it also has serious limitations, and has by and large ignored cognitivist perspectives on multimodality. Since other, older disciplines within the humanities (such as visual art, film, opera, comics & graphic novels), and some in the social sciences (such as mass-communication and anthropology) have long studied phenomena that would nowadays be labelled “multimodal,” greater agreement about key issues would also help make clear how multimodality can both enrich and benefit from these other disciplines. This paper presents eight theses aiming to spawn discussion that will further help establish multimodality as a robust academic discipline.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Communication
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2026.1768954
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How can multimodality mature into a robust scholarly discipline? A cognitivist's perspective

Charles J. Forceville
Frontiers in Communication
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
article

How can multimodality mature into a robust scholarly discipline? A cognitivist's perspective

Charles J. Forceville
article en

Abstract

Further developing multimodality into a respectable discipline requires that its advocates agree about central concepts and about how these concepts must or can be applied to data. Hitherto, multimodality scholarship has been dominated by Social Semiotics, building on Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL). While this approach has spawned many interesting and useful ideas, it also has serious limitations, and has by and large ignored cognitivist perspectives on multimodality. Since other, older disciplines within the humanities (such as visual art, film, opera, comics & graphic novels), and some in the social sciences (such as mass-communication and anthropology) have long studied phenomena that would nowadays be labelled “multimodal,” greater agreement about key issues would also help make clear how multimodality can both enrich and benefit from these other disciplines. This paper presents eight theses aiming to spawn discussion that will further help establish multimodality as a robust academic discipline.

Frontiers in CommunicationVol. 11
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon