Psychosis prevalence studies in the OECD: a scoping review and recommendations for psychosis prevalence research in Aotearoa New Zealand

Abstract Background In Aotearoa New Zealand, there is limited quality and up-to-date national psychosis prevalence data to guide service provision. Planned studies must account for socio-cultural and historical context of Aotearoa New Zealand. Method and purpose To inform Aotearoa New Zealand research, we first conducted a scoping review of psychosis prevalence studies in OECD and Pacific countries. The aims of the scoping review were to describe: (1) target populations and sampling frames, (2) psychosis measures, and (3) additional socio-demographic and contextual measures including ethnicity/Indigeneity. Following the scoping review, findings were critically synthesised against authors’ local expertise to inform recommendations for Aotearoa New Zealand. Results One hundred and thirty psychosis prevalence studies (18 child/youth; 112 adult studies) were identified, mostly in general populations, followed by justice, unhoused/temporarily housed, and psychiatric inpatients. Common screening instruments were the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Few studies had the primary aim of estimating psychosis prevalence; most included studies estimated psychosis prevalence as part of broader research aims. Sociodemographic factors and other contextual factors were commonly reported. However, reporting practices regarding ethnicity, and in particular Indigeneity, are limited: only 21/130 total studies (16.2%) report prevalence stratified by ethnicity. Only 14 studies reported inclusion of Indigenous Peoples. Conclusions Due to methodological challenges, psychosis prevalence studies often use incomplete, biased population sampling frames, and infrequently report ethnicity and Indigeneity. Despite limitations, robust psychosis prevalence data are needed. We outline recommendations for doing so in Aotearoa New Zealand child/youth and adult populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-026-03242-w
Primary Topic
Schizophrenia research and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychosis prevalence studies in the OECD: a scoping review and recommendations for psychosis prevalence research in Aotearoa New Zealand

Rebecca E. Grattan, Tai R. Kake, Rees Tapsell, Amanda Luckman et al.
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Schizophrenia research and treatment
article

Psychosis prevalence studies in the OECD: a scoping review and recommendations for psychosis prevalence research in Aotearoa New Zealand

Rebecca E. Grattan, Tai R. Kake, Rees Tapsell, Amanda Luckman, Eleanor Baggott, Helen Lockett, Bess M. Kew, Richard Porter, Nathan J Monk, Jenni Manuel, Nadia Summers, Karlie Willis
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background In Aotearoa New Zealand, there is limited quality and up-to-date national psychosis prevalence data to guide service provision. Planned studies must account for socio-cultural and historical context of Aotearoa New Zealand. Method and purpose To inform Aotearoa New Zealand research, we first conducted a scoping review of psychosis prevalence studies in OECD and Pacific countries. The aims of the scoping review were to describe: (1) target populations and sampling frames, (2) psychosis measures, and (3) additional socio-demographic and contextual measures including ethnicity/Indigeneity. Following the scoping review, findings were critically synthesised against authors’ local expertise to inform recommendations for Aotearoa New Zealand. Results One hundred and thirty psychosis prevalence studies (18 child/youth; 112 adult studies) were identified, mostly in general populations, followed by justice, unhoused/temporarily housed, and psychiatric inpatients. Common screening instruments were the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Few studies had the primary aim of estimating psychosis prevalence; most included studies estimated psychosis prevalence as part of broader research aims. Sociodemographic factors and other contextual factors were commonly reported. However, reporting practices regarding ethnicity, and in particular Indigeneity, are limited: only 21/130 total studies (16.2%) report prevalence stratified by ethnicity. Only 14 studies reported inclusion of Indigenous Peoples. Conclusions Due to methodological challenges, psychosis prevalence studies often use incomplete, biased population sampling frames, and infrequently report ethnicity and Indigeneity. Despite limitations, robust psychosis prevalence data are needed. We outline recommendations for doing so in Aotearoa New Zealand child/youth and adult populations.

Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
University of Auckland (NZ), Victoria University of Wellington (NZ), Health New Zealand (NZ), University of Otago (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Schizophrenia research and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon