Atopic biologic use and recalled irritable bowel syndrome symptom severity: A hypothesis generating retrospective survey evaluation

Background: Case reports indicate that omalizumab may be therapeutic in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), but this has not been confirmed with follow-up studies. Objective: The present study sought to determine if biologics used to treat atopy have any effect on recalled IBS severity. Methods: All patients ≥ 12 years of age with IBS and currently taking an atopic biologic were sent a questionnaire that assesses IBS severity currently and before starting their atopic biologic. The IBS Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS) and IBS Adequate Relief metric were used to quantify IBS severity pre- and post-atopic biologic. Bonferroni-corrected Wilcoxon signed rank tests with Hodges-Lehman estimated median differences and 95% confidence intervals (CI) compared IBS-SSS pre- and post-atopic biologic start. Subset analyses of patients taking omalizumab or dupliumab were also conducted. Results: Sixteen patients (12% response rate) fully responded to the questionnaire (omalizumab, n = 7; dupilumab, n = 7; mepolizumab, n = 1; tezepelumab, n = 1). The majority were women (75%) with a median (range) age of 41 years (22‐71 years). The frequency of respondents who reported adequate relief of their IBS did not differ pre- and post-atopic biologic start (p = 0.688), but patients reported significantly decreased IBS-SSS post-atopic biologic start (estimated median difference 70.0 [95% CI, 20.0‐122.5]; z = −2.59, p = 0.0097). One patient (6%) taking omalizumab reported complete resolution of IBS symptoms. The majority of the patients (56%) reported a decrease of at least 50 in the IBS-SSS. Although subset analyses of patients taking omalizumab or dupilumab did not show statistically significant differences pre- and post-atopic biologic start, the estimated median IBS-SSS difference pre- and post-atopic biologic start was 93.8 (95% CI, −15.5 to 201.5) and 22.0 (95% CI, −27.5 to 149.0) for omalizumab and dupilumab, respectively. Conclusion: The patients with IBS reported improved recalled IBS severity after starting an atopic biologic, with patients taking omalizumab reporting a larger difference. Future controlled studies are needed to confirm this finding.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Allergy and Asthma Proceedings
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2026.47.260070
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Atopic biologic use and recalled irritable bowel syndrome symptom severity: A hypothesis generating retrospective survey evaluation

Michael William Tsoulis, Marcus S Shaker
1 citations
Allergy and Asthma Proceedings
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
6.52
article

Atopic biologic use and recalled irritable bowel syndrome symptom severity: A hypothesis generating retrospective survey evaluation

Michael William Tsoulis, Marcus S Shaker
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Case reports indicate that omalizumab may be therapeutic in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), but this has not been confirmed with follow-up studies. Objective: The present study sought to determine if biologics used to treat atopy have any effect on recalled IBS severity. Methods: All patients ≥ 12 years of age with IBS and currently taking an atopic biologic were sent a questionnaire that assesses IBS severity currently and before starting their atopic biologic. The IBS Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS) and IBS Adequate Relief metric were used to quantify IBS severity pre- and post-atopic biologic. Bonferroni-corrected Wilcoxon signed rank tests with Hodges-Lehman estimated median differences and 95% confidence intervals (CI) compared IBS-SSS pre- and post-atopic biologic start. Subset analyses of patients taking omalizumab or dupliumab were also conducted. Results: Sixteen patients (12% response rate) fully responded to the questionnaire (omalizumab, n = 7; dupilumab, n = 7; mepolizumab, n = 1; tezepelumab, n = 1). The majority were women (75%) with a median (range) age of 41 years (22‐71 years). The frequency of respondents who reported adequate relief of their IBS did not differ pre- and post-atopic biologic start (p = 0.688), but patients reported significantly decreased IBS-SSS post-atopic biologic start (estimated median difference 70.0 [95% CI, 20.0‐122.5]; z = −2.59, p = 0.0097). One patient (6%) taking omalizumab reported complete resolution of IBS symptoms. The majority of the patients (56%) reported a decrease of at least 50 in the IBS-SSS. Although subset analyses of patients taking omalizumab or dupilumab did not show statistically significant differences pre- and post-atopic biologic start, the estimated median IBS-SSS difference pre- and post-atopic biologic start was 93.8 (95% CI, −15.5 to 201.5) and 22.0 (95% CI, −27.5 to 149.0) for omalizumab and dupilumab, respectively. Conclusion: The patients with IBS reported improved recalled IBS severity after starting an atopic biologic, with patients taking omalizumab reporting a larger difference. Future controlled studies are needed to confirm this finding.

Allergy and Asthma ProceedingsVol. 47(6)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
6.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon