Leveraging artificial intelligence for autonomous space healthcare: current evidence, operational architecture and research priorities for deep-space exploration

Introduction Deep-space missions will progressively limit real-time ground support, rapid evacuation and resupply, creating a need for medical capabilities that can operate with graded autonomy. Artificial intelligence (AI) may support this transition, but terrestrial performance cannot be equated with spaceflight readiness. Methods We conducted a narrative, hypothesis-generating review of literature relevant to AI-enabled space healthcare. Sources were selected iteratively for their contribution to health monitoring, biofluid analysis, medical imaging, clinical decision support or radiation assessment. The review did not use a systematic screening protocol or formal meta-analytic quality assessment; therefore, findings are synthesised qualitatively and claims are calibrated to evidence maturity. Results Evidence was grouped as spaceflight operational use, space-relevant prototype or analogue demonstration, terrestrial clinical validation, terrestrial experimental demonstration, or conceptual transfer. AI may support personalised monitoring, biofluid interpretation, ultrasound acquisition and analysis, radiation forecasting and clinical decision support. However, most cited applications remain terrestrial demonstrations. Key barriers include limited astronaut data, shifted physiological baselines, restricted computation and power, sensor and storage constraints, model drift, explainability, uncertainty management and failure handling. Conclusion AI is most plausibly deployed as one component of an integrated autonomous medical system that combines wearables and biosensors, onboard records, imaging, radiation monitoring, clinical decision support, crew oversight and delayed telemedical consultation. Near-term priorities are prospective validation in mission-relevant analogues, personalised baselines, resource-aware edge deployment, explicit uncertainty thresholds, human override and pre-defined safe fallback procedures. AI should augment rather than replace telemedicine and professional judgement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Space Technologies
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frspt.2026.1741121
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leveraging artificial intelligence for autonomous space healthcare: current evidence, operational architecture and research priorities for deep-space exploration

Olivier Van Hoey, Alessio Parisi, Sarah Baatout, Julie Manon et al.
2 links
Frontiers in Space Technologies
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Leveraging artificial intelligence for autonomous space healthcare: current evidence, operational architecture and research priorities for deep-space exploration

Olivier Van Hoey, Alessio Parisi, Sarah Baatout, Julie Manon, Ilaria Cinelli, William Dobney, Silvie Kerremans, Silvana Ferreira da Silva Miranda
article en

Abstract

Introduction Deep-space missions will progressively limit real-time ground support, rapid evacuation and resupply, creating a need for medical capabilities that can operate with graded autonomy. Artificial intelligence (AI) may support this transition, but terrestrial performance cannot be equated with spaceflight readiness. Methods We conducted a narrative, hypothesis-generating review of literature relevant to AI-enabled space healthcare. Sources were selected iteratively for their contribution to health monitoring, biofluid analysis, medical imaging, clinical decision support or radiation assessment. The review did not use a systematic screening protocol or formal meta-analytic quality assessment; therefore, findings are synthesised qualitatively and claims are calibrated to evidence maturity. Results Evidence was grouped as spaceflight operational use, space-relevant prototype or analogue demonstration, terrestrial clinical validation, terrestrial experimental demonstration, or conceptual transfer. AI may support personalised monitoring, biofluid interpretation, ultrasound acquisition and analysis, radiation forecasting and clinical decision support. However, most cited applications remain terrestrial demonstrations. Key barriers include limited astronaut data, shifted physiological baselines, restricted computation and power, sensor and storage constraints, model drift, explainability, uncertainty management and failure handling. Conclusion AI is most plausibly deployed as one component of an integrated autonomous medical system that combines wearables and biosensors, onboard records, imaging, radiation monitoring, clinical decision support, crew oversight and delayed telemedical consultation. Near-term priorities are prospective validation in mission-relevant analogues, personalised baselines, resource-aware edge deployment, explicit uncertainty thresholds, human override and pre-defined safe fallback procedures. AI should augment rather than replace telemedicine and professional judgement.

Frontiers in Space TechnologiesVol. 7
Loughborough University (GB), Aerospace Medical Association (US), Ghent University (BE), Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (BE), UCLouvain (BE), KU Leuven (BE)
Belgian Federal Science Policy Office, KU Leuven
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon