Response‐Adapted Surgery Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Era‐Based Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: Evidence regarding response-adapted resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma remains limited. METHODS: We compared conventional-era (2018-2021) and response-adapted-era (2022-2024) surgery after NACT. Margins, recurrence, 2-year survival, and surgical outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Among 129 patients (58 conventional; 71 response-adapted), positive margins occurred in 3.4% versus 1.4% and local recurrence in 12.1% versus 7.0%. Two-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 56.6% versus 67.8% (log-rank p = 0.135). Adjusted DFS HR for the response-adapted era was 0.54 (95% CI 0.28-1.04; p = 0.066). ENE predicted inferior DFS (HR 3.60; p < 0.001). Responder-only analysis showed no significant survival difference. CONCLUSIONS: No observed increase in positive margins or local recurrence accompanied the later surgical strategy. Retrospective selection, unequal follow-up, and limited events preclude conclusions of noninferiority or a causal survival benefit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Head & Neck
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.70532
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Response‐Adapted Surgery Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Era‐Based Retrospective Cohort Study

Jitin Goyal, Parveen Ahlawat, Sunil Pasricha, Abhishek Gugliani et al.
4 links
Head & Neck
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
article

Response‐Adapted Surgery Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Era‐Based Retrospective Cohort Study

Jitin Goyal, Parveen Ahlawat, Sunil Pasricha, Abhishek Gugliani, Manoj Gupta, Neha Garg, Munish Gairola, Sarthak Tandon, Shreya Rai, Pradyumna Singh, Mudit Agarwal, Rajat Saha, Kshitiz Bansal, P. Karthik, Rashmi Bansal, P. Leela, Abhishek Singh
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence regarding response-adapted resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma remains limited. METHODS: We compared conventional-era (2018-2021) and response-adapted-era (2022-2024) surgery after NACT. Margins, recurrence, 2-year survival, and surgical outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Among 129 patients (58 conventional; 71 response-adapted), positive margins occurred in 3.4% versus 1.4% and local recurrence in 12.1% versus 7.0%. Two-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 56.6% versus 67.8% (log-rank p = 0.135). Adjusted DFS HR for the response-adapted era was 0.54 (95% CI 0.28-1.04; p = 0.066). ENE predicted inferior DFS (HR 3.60; p < 0.001). Responder-only analysis showed no significant survival difference. CONCLUSIONS: No observed increase in positive margins or local recurrence accompanied the later surgical strategy. Retrospective selection, unequal follow-up, and limited events preclude conclusions of noninferiority or a causal survival benefit.

Head & Neck
Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Response‐Adapted Surgery Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Era‐Based Retrospective Cohort Study — Jitin Goyal, Parveen Ahlawat, et al. · Head & Neck (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS