Rapid recovery following disruptions in an attention-demanding task

Previous research demonstrates that people can track multiple moving objects through disruptions, including when all the objects disappear for a brief gap. It seems likely that it takes us time to resume the tracking task after such a gap, and our primary goal in this paper is to measure that time. We refer to it as the recovery time because participants are recovering from the gap. We report five experiments using the multiple object tracking task in which participants tracked a subset of moving identical stimuli through a brief gap. One stimulus was probed at variable delays following reappearance, and we measured reaction time (RT) to identify the probe as a target or distractor. We estimated recovery time using the RT-by-probe delay function, finding a value around 40 ms. To our knowledge, this is the first report measuring this duration. Additionally, we found that the recovery time is consistent across factors that are known to affect the difficulty of tracking and target identification. These findings constrain theories about how the visual system handles gaps in tracking. They also are consistent with the hypothesis that the visual system pauses the tracking task during a gap by storing task-relevant information offline, then reloading it after the gap.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Psychologica
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107970
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rapid recovery following disruptions in an attention-demanding task

Skyler S. Place, Amanda S. Morrison, David E. Fencsik, Navdeep Gill
Acta Psychologica
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
article

Rapid recovery following disruptions in an attention-demanding task

Skyler S. Place, Amanda S. Morrison, David E. Fencsik, Navdeep Gill
article en

Abstract

Previous research demonstrates that people can track multiple moving objects through disruptions, including when all the objects disappear for a brief gap. It seems likely that it takes us time to resume the tracking task after such a gap, and our primary goal in this paper is to measure that time. We refer to it as the recovery time because participants are recovering from the gap. We report five experiments using the multiple object tracking task in which participants tracked a subset of moving identical stimuli through a brief gap. One stimulus was probed at variable delays following reappearance, and we measured reaction time (RT) to identify the probe as a target or distractor. We estimated recovery time using the RT-by-probe delay function, finding a value around 40 ms. To our knowledge, this is the first report measuring this duration. Additionally, we found that the recovery time is consistent across factors that are known to affect the difficulty of tracking and target identification. These findings constrain theories about how the visual system handles gaps in tracking. They also are consistent with the hypothesis that the visual system pauses the tracking task during a gap by storing task-relevant information offline, then reloading it after the gap.

Acta PsychologicaVol. 271
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), California State University, East Bay (US)
California State University, East Bay
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon