Pasture soil carbon stock: comparison with disturbed Atlantic Forest and impact of improved management

This study investigated how the conversion of disturbed Atlantic Forest remnants to pastures, followed by pasture intensification, affects soil carbon (C) stocks and sequestration potential in São Paulo State, Brazil. Three forest–pasture pairs located on contrasting soils (two clayey Oxisols and one medium-textured Ultisol) were evaluated, combined with grazing and fertilization experiments under non-rotational and rotational dairy and beef systems. Forest–pasture comparisons showed that land use conversion increased soil bulk density, indicating cattle-induced compaction. Forests exhibited higher C and N concentrations, particularly in surface layers, associated with continuous litter deposition, chemically recalcitrant biomass, preserved soil structure, and greater biological activity. In contrast, pastures showed lower C and N concentrations, particularly at the RU-NO site (Ultisol). Responses of cumulative soil C stocks varied among sites. In one clayey Oxisol, pasture soils exhibited greater C stocks at 40–100 cm than forest soils, likely associated with deep Urochloa rooting and organomineral stabilization. Conversely, forest-to-pasture conversion reduced soil C stocks down to 100 cm in the Ultisol and in the second Oxisol, indicating greater susceptibility to C losses under low-input pasture systems. Natural-abundance δ 13 C profiles revealed predominance of C₄-derived carbon in pasture soils and mixed C₃–C₄ signatures in forest areas, reflecting historical land-use dynamics and legacy effects. Improved pasture management increased soil C stocks in the 0–30 cm layer within two years. Non-rotational systems showed C accumulation rates ranging from 3 to 6 t C ha -1 yr -1 , whereas rotational systems accumulated between 1 and 4 t C ha -1 yr -1 . Land- use change factors for the 0–30 cm layer were close to the IPCC reference value (1), although contrasting responses were observed when deeper soil layers were considered. Overall, low-input pasture systems promoted reductions in soil C stocks, whereas improved pasture management, including fertilization, legume integration, and grazing control, enhanced soil C accumulation, particularly in clay-rich soils.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CATENA
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2026.110715
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pasture soil carbon stock: comparison with disturbed Atlantic Forest and impact of improved management

Luciana Gerdes, M. A. V. Ligo, Breno dos Santos Barros, Thaís Alves de Carvalho et al.
CATENA
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
article

Pasture soil carbon stock: comparison with disturbed Atlantic Forest and impact of improved management

Luciana Gerdes, M. A. V. Ligo, Breno dos Santos Barros, Thaís Alves de Carvalho, Sandra Furlan Nogueira, Marina Justi, Cristiano Alberto de Andrade, Flávio Perna, P. P. A. Oliveira, Wilfredo Manuel Rios Rado, Paulo Henrique Mazza Rodrigues
article en

Abstract

This study investigated how the conversion of disturbed Atlantic Forest remnants to pastures, followed by pasture intensification, affects soil carbon (C) stocks and sequestration potential in São Paulo State, Brazil. Three forest–pasture pairs located on contrasting soils (two clayey Oxisols and one medium-textured Ultisol) were evaluated, combined with grazing and fertilization experiments under non-rotational and rotational dairy and beef systems. Forest–pasture comparisons showed that land use conversion increased soil bulk density, indicating cattle-induced compaction. Forests exhibited higher C and N concentrations, particularly in surface layers, associated with continuous litter deposition, chemically recalcitrant biomass, preserved soil structure, and greater biological activity. In contrast, pastures showed lower C and N concentrations, particularly at the RU-NO site (Ultisol). Responses of cumulative soil C stocks varied among sites. In one clayey Oxisol, pasture soils exhibited greater C stocks at 40–100 cm than forest soils, likely associated with deep Urochloa rooting and organomineral stabilization. Conversely, forest-to-pasture conversion reduced soil C stocks down to 100 cm in the Ultisol and in the second Oxisol, indicating greater susceptibility to C losses under low-input pasture systems. Natural-abundance δ 13 C profiles revealed predominance of C₄-derived carbon in pasture soils and mixed C₃–C₄ signatures in forest areas, reflecting historical land-use dynamics and legacy effects. Improved pasture management increased soil C stocks in the 0–30 cm layer within two years. Non-rotational systems showed C accumulation rates ranging from 3 to 6 t C ha -1 yr -1 , whereas rotational systems accumulated between 1 and 4 t C ha -1 yr -1 . Land- use change factors for the 0–30 cm layer were close to the IPCC reference value (1), although contrasting responses were observed when deeper soil layers were considered. Overall, low-input pasture systems promoted reductions in soil C stocks, whereas improved pasture management, including fertilization, legume integration, and grazing control, enhanced soil C accumulation, particularly in clay-rich soils.

CATENAVol. 276
Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (BR), Institute of Animal Science and Pastures (BR), Embrapa Meio Ambiente (BR), Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste (BR)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Life on land, Climate action, Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon