Rollback Recovery: Measuring Repair, Disclosure, and Restraint After Agent Errors

Rollback Recovery measures whether an agent restores damaged state, reports the incident, and avoids needless repair. Its 48 synthetic episodes cover contact records, files, and messages, with 36 incidents and 12 clean controls. A visible-information scripted policy passes 48/48 tasks (100.0 [92.6, 100.0] percent; Wilson 95% interval). Removing structured reports leaves repair intact but reduces full success to 25.0 [14.9, 38.8] percent. Removing state tags reduces success to 45.8 [32.6, 59.7] percent. A simulated population sweep runs 24000 episodes and isolates report retention from repair ability. At half retention, simulated full success is 62.2 [60.9, 63.4] percent (bootstrap 95% interval across simulated agents). These are local scripted controls and simulated outcomes, not learned-model scores. Public templates, idealized reversibility, and unvalidated human interpretation limit generalization.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23752420
Primary Topic
Information and Cyber Security
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Rollback Recovery: Measuring Repair, Disclosure, and Restraint After Agent Errors

Pooria Arab
1 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Information and Cyber Security
preprint

Rollback Recovery: Measuring Repair, Disclosure, and Restraint After Agent Errors

Pooria Arab
preprint en

Abstract

Rollback Recovery measures whether an agent restores damaged state, reports the incident, and avoids needless repair. Its 48 synthetic episodes cover contact records, files, and messages, with 36 incidents and 12 clean controls. A visible-information scripted policy passes 48/48 tasks (100.0 [92.6, 100.0] percent; Wilson 95% interval). Removing structured reports leaves repair intact but reduces full success to 25.0 [14.9, 38.8] percent. Removing state tags reduces success to 45.8 [32.6, 59.7] percent. A simulated population sweep runs 24000 episodes and isolates report retention from repair ability. At half retention, simulated full success is 62.2 [60.9, 63.4] percent (bootstrap 95% interval across simulated agents). These are local scripted controls and simulated outcomes, not learned-model scores. Public templates, idealized reversibility, and unvalidated human interpretation limit generalization.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Information and Cyber Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon