Precision Profiling of α‐1,4‐ Versus α‐1,6‐Glycosidase Activity Through Synthetic Linear and Branched Glycogen Tetramers Using Cyclic Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry and High‐Performance Liquid Chromatography‐Mass Spectrometry

Accurately defining glycosidase specificity is often limited by access to well‐defined oligosaccharide probes and analytical tools capable of resolving regioisomers at low concentrations. We synthesized two linear and one branched glycogen‐mimetic tetrasaccharides, bearing exclusively 1,2‐ cis , namely α‐1,4 or α‐1,6 linkages using a reagent‐controlled stereoselective glycosylation strategy. Their enzymatic degradation by Homo sapiens glycogen debranching enzyme ( Hs GDE) and two commercial α‐1,4‐glucosidases was assessed by hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry and high‐resolution cyclic ion mobility mass spectrometry (cIMS‐MS), enabling separation and quantification of substrates and products in the micromolar range. Hs GDE selectively cleaved the α‐1,6‐branch while showing low activity on terminal α‐1,6 linkages. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae α‐1,4‐glucosidase showed high α‐1,4 selectivity, whereas the rice enzyme displayed broad promiscuity toward all regioisomers. The cIMS‐MS provided rapid baseline separation of the synthetic tetrasaccharides and confirmed the absence of inhibition by nonsubstrate isomers. This integrated synthetic‐analytical workflow offers an efficient platform for rapid annotation of glycosidase specificity and mechanistic studies in glycogen metabolism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ChemistryEurope
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ceur.70381
Primary Topic
Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Precision Profiling of α‐1,4‐ Versus α‐1,6‐Glycosidase Activity Through Synthetic Linear and Branched Glycogen Tetramers Using Cyclic Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry and High‐Performance Liquid Chromatography‐Mass Spectrometry

Georg Niggemeyer, Peter H. Seeberger, Salomé Poyer, Estelle Messé et al.
ChemistryEurope
Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
article

Precision Profiling of α‐1,4‐ Versus α‐1,6‐Glycosidase Activity Through Synthetic Linear and Branched Glycogen Tetramers Using Cyclic Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry and High‐Performance Liquid Chromatography‐Mass Spectrometry

Georg Niggemeyer, Peter H. Seeberger, Salomé Poyer, Estelle Messé, Stéphanie Norsikian, Sébastien Vidal, Jean‐François Gallard, Cédric Przybylski, Christian Roth, Zineb Chaabi, Benoît Keromnes, Delphine Carry, Ruben Ananian
article en

Abstract

Accurately defining glycosidase specificity is often limited by access to well‐defined oligosaccharide probes and analytical tools capable of resolving regioisomers at low concentrations. We synthesized two linear and one branched glycogen‐mimetic tetrasaccharides, bearing exclusively 1,2‐ cis , namely α‐1,4 or α‐1,6 linkages using a reagent‐controlled stereoselective glycosylation strategy. Their enzymatic degradation by Homo sapiens glycogen debranching enzyme ( Hs GDE) and two commercial α‐1,4‐glucosidases was assessed by hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry and high‐resolution cyclic ion mobility mass spectrometry (cIMS‐MS), enabling separation and quantification of substrates and products in the micromolar range. Hs GDE selectively cleaved the α‐1,6‐branch while showing low activity on terminal α‐1,6 linkages. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae α‐1,4‐glucosidase showed high α‐1,4 selectivity, whereas the rice enzyme displayed broad promiscuity toward all regioisomers. The cIMS‐MS provided rapid baseline separation of the synthetic tetrasaccharides and confirmed the absence of inhibition by nonsubstrate isomers. This integrated synthetic‐analytical workflow offers an efficient platform for rapid annotation of glycosidase specificity and mechanistic studies in glycogen metabolism.

ChemistryEuropeVol. 4(11)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Institut de Chimie des Substances Naturelles (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces (DE), Laboratoire Analyse et Modélisation pour la Biologie et l'Environnement (FR), CY Cergy Paris Université (FR), Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Genopole, Université Paris-Saclay, Université d'Évry Val-d'Essonne
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon