Can You Erase the Mark of a Criminal Record? Labor Market Impacts of Criminal Record Remediation

We investigate whether removing a previously obtained criminal record improves employment outcomes. We estimate the causal impact of criminal record remediation laws that have been widely enacted with the goal of improving employment opportunities for millions of individuals with records. We find consistent evidence that removing an existing record does not improve labor market outcomes, on average. A notable exception is participation in gig work through online platforms, which often screen workers based on their records but not their employment histories. The evidence is consistent with records initially scarring labor market trajectories in a way that is difficult to undo later. (JEL H76, J22, J23, K14, K42, M51)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Economic Journal Economic Policy
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20240830
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can You Erase the Mark of a Criminal Record? Labor Market Impacts of Criminal Record Remediation

Andrew Garin, Crystal Yang, Dmitri Koustas, Amanda Agan et al.
1 links
American Economic Journal Economic Policy
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Can You Erase the Mark of a Criminal Record? Labor Market Impacts of Criminal Record Remediation

Andrew Garin, Crystal Yang, Dmitri Koustas, Amanda Agan, Alexandre Mas
article en

Abstract

We investigate whether removing a previously obtained criminal record improves employment outcomes. We estimate the causal impact of criminal record remediation laws that have been widely enacted with the goal of improving employment opportunities for millions of individuals with records. We find consistent evidence that removing an existing record does not improve labor market outcomes, on average. A notable exception is participation in gig work through online platforms, which often screen workers based on their records but not their employment histories. The evidence is consistent with records initially scarring labor market trajectories in a way that is difficult to undo later. (JEL H76, J22, J23, K14, K42, M51)

American Economic Journal Economic PolicyVol. 18(4)
National Bureau of Economic Research (US), Harvard University (US), Cornell University (US), University of Chicago (US), Carnegie Mellon University (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Decent work and economic growth, Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Can You Erase the Mark of a Criminal Record? Labor Market Impacts of Criminal Record Remediation — Andrew Garin, Crystal Yang, et al. · American Economic Journal Economic Policy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS