Spatial Implementation Feasibility of Low-Impact Development for Sustainable Urban Stormwater Management: A Dual-Boundary Framework Linking Hydrologic Demand and Physical Spatial Capacity

Hydrologic effectiveness does not necessarily imply spatial implementability for low-impact development (LID) in space-constrained built-up areas. Existing LID planning and multi-objective optimization studies focus on runoff-control performance, construction costs, and spatial configuration, but rarely assess whether the scale required to meet a stormwater-control target can be accommodated by retrofit space. Here, we develop a dual-boundary framework that compares the hydrologic requirement lower bound Smin, defined as a probabilistic planning bound based on the 95% posterior-coverage criterion, with the spatial capacity upper bound Smax, representing the maximum proportion of subcatchment area available for potential LID retrofitting under built-environment constraints. Smax is quantified using a stepwise spatial deduction mechanism (SSDM), whereas Smin is inferred from Storm Water Management Model (SWMM)-generated samples using a hierarchical Bayesian network (HBN). In a built-up area of Hohhot, mean Smax and Smin were 42.37% and 27.44%, yet 17% of the area exhibited Smin > Smax. For performance-matched Pareto solutions, the mean runoff-reduction matching error was 0.52%, while the weighted spatial exceedance ratio reached 1.70%, with potentially infeasible investment exposure averaging CNY 1.32 million. Clipping allocations above Smax reduced runoff-control performance by 1.42% on average. Under the built-environment and rainfall conditions examined, these results show that aggregate capacity surplus can conceal local demand–capacity mismatch and that part of the simulated hydrologic performance may depend on LID areas exceeding local spatial capacity. By jointly assessing hydrologic demand and spatial capacity, the dual-boundary framework provides a practical basis for incorporating spatial implementation feasibility into LID planning, thereby supporting more sustainable urban stormwater management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su182110985
Primary Topic
Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatial Implementation Feasibility of Low-Impact Development for Sustainable Urban Stormwater Management: A Dual-Boundary Framework Linking Hydrologic Demand and Physical Spatial Capacity

Xizhi Lv, Chao Li, Qian Xu, Shiang Zhang
2 links
Sustainability
Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
article

Spatial Implementation Feasibility of Low-Impact Development for Sustainable Urban Stormwater Management: A Dual-Boundary Framework Linking Hydrologic Demand and Physical Spatial Capacity

Xizhi Lv, Chao Li, Qian Xu, Shiang Zhang
article en

Abstract

Hydrologic effectiveness does not necessarily imply spatial implementability for low-impact development (LID) in space-constrained built-up areas. Existing LID planning and multi-objective optimization studies focus on runoff-control performance, construction costs, and spatial configuration, but rarely assess whether the scale required to meet a stormwater-control target can be accommodated by retrofit space. Here, we develop a dual-boundary framework that compares the hydrologic requirement lower bound Smin, defined as a probabilistic planning bound based on the 95% posterior-coverage criterion, with the spatial capacity upper bound Smax, representing the maximum proportion of subcatchment area available for potential LID retrofitting under built-environment constraints. Smax is quantified using a stepwise spatial deduction mechanism (SSDM), whereas Smin is inferred from Storm Water Management Model (SWMM)-generated samples using a hierarchical Bayesian network (HBN). In a built-up area of Hohhot, mean Smax and Smin were 42.37% and 27.44%, yet 17% of the area exhibited Smin > Smax. For performance-matched Pareto solutions, the mean runoff-reduction matching error was 0.52%, while the weighted spatial exceedance ratio reached 1.70%, with potentially infeasible investment exposure averaging CNY 1.32 million. Clipping allocations above Smax reduced runoff-control performance by 1.42% on average. Under the built-environment and rainfall conditions examined, these results show that aggregate capacity surplus can conceal local demand–capacity mismatch and that part of the simulated hydrologic performance may depend on LID areas exceeding local spatial capacity. By jointly assessing hydrologic demand and spatial capacity, the dual-boundary framework provides a practical basis for incorporating spatial implementation feasibility into LID planning, thereby supporting more sustainable urban stormwater management.

SustainabilityVol. 18(21)
Inner Mongolia Agricultural University (CN), Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China (CN), Yellow River Institute of Hydraulic Research (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Sustainable cities and communities, Clean water and sanitation, Climate action, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon