Kaleidoscope Analysis: a multi-theoretical framework for exploring lived experience, identity and structural power

Purpose Kaleidoscope Analysis is a multi-theoretical framework for examining how lived experience, identity and structural power interact within qualitative research. The framework responds to limitations in existing methods, many of which engage experiential, identity based and structural perspectives without an explicit framework for integrating them, by offering an approach that holds these analytic planes in dynamic relation. Design/methodology/approach Grounded in a critical realist ontology, intersectionality as a non-negotiable analytic foundation and informed by Black feminist epistemology, Kaleidoscope Analysis integrates three lenses: Lived Experience, Intersectionality and Structural–Systemic Analysis. Analytic movement is conceptualised as kaleidoscopic: shifting vantage points reveal different patterns of meaning, allowing idiographic depth to sit alongside critical, systemic interpretation and giving rise to an Integrative Kaleidoscopic View. Positionality operates as method, recognising researchers as situated knowers whose identities and structural locations shape interpretive insight. A worked example from the author's empirical study illustrates how the lenses interact in practice. Findings Kaleidoscope Analysis illuminates patterned relationships between individual meaning making, intersecting identities and socio-political structures. Moving across lenses enables previously obscured mechanisms, including racism, ableism, gendered norms and institutional conditions, to become analytically visible through their effects on lived experience. Originality/value The framework offers a named, rigorous and adaptable approach for analysing phenomena where embodiment, identity and power are tightly entangled. Its explicit intersectional grounding, multi-lens structure and emphasis on positionality support justice-oriented qualitative inquiry that remains accountable to the communities whose experiences are explored.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Research Journal
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/qrj-04-2026-0169
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kaleidoscope Analysis: a multi-theoretical framework for exploring lived experience, identity and structural power

T. Kirk Nelson
1 links
Qualitative Research Journal
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
article

Kaleidoscope Analysis: a multi-theoretical framework for exploring lived experience, identity and structural power

T. Kirk Nelson
article en

Abstract

Purpose Kaleidoscope Analysis is a multi-theoretical framework for examining how lived experience, identity and structural power interact within qualitative research. The framework responds to limitations in existing methods, many of which engage experiential, identity based and structural perspectives without an explicit framework for integrating them, by offering an approach that holds these analytic planes in dynamic relation. Design/methodology/approach Grounded in a critical realist ontology, intersectionality as a non-negotiable analytic foundation and informed by Black feminist epistemology, Kaleidoscope Analysis integrates three lenses: Lived Experience, Intersectionality and Structural–Systemic Analysis. Analytic movement is conceptualised as kaleidoscopic: shifting vantage points reveal different patterns of meaning, allowing idiographic depth to sit alongside critical, systemic interpretation and giving rise to an Integrative Kaleidoscopic View. Positionality operates as method, recognising researchers as situated knowers whose identities and structural locations shape interpretive insight. A worked example from the author's empirical study illustrates how the lenses interact in practice. Findings Kaleidoscope Analysis illuminates patterned relationships between individual meaning making, intersecting identities and socio-political structures. Moving across lenses enables previously obscured mechanisms, including racism, ableism, gendered norms and institutional conditions, to become analytically visible through their effects on lived experience. Originality/value The framework offers a named, rigorous and adaptable approach for analysing phenomena where embodiment, identity and power are tightly entangled. Its explicit intersectional grounding, multi-lens structure and emphasis on positionality support justice-oriented qualitative inquiry that remains accountable to the communities whose experiences are explored.

Qualitative Research Journal
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon