T-cell states in aortic dissection: from molecular immune profiling toward causal and translational validation

Single-cell RNA sequencing and T-cell receptor profiling reveal substantial T-cell heterogeneity in aortic dissection (AD), but whether these responses contribute to vascular injury or reflect post-onset immune activation remains uncertain. This review evaluates human and experimental evidence by disease stage, tissue compartment, functional validation, T-cell specificity, and intervention timing, distinguishing descriptive profiling from evidence supporting causal and translational inference. Human studies identify Th1/Th17-associated, CD8+ cytotoxicity-associated, and regulatory T-cell alterations, with stage-related differences in T-cell composition and clonality. Most evidence is cross-sectional and obtained after clinical onset. Antigen specificity, direct aortic-wall cytotoxicity, impaired Treg suppression, and T-cell-mediated aortic-wall injury remain unproven. Single-cell and TCR profiling identify candidate T-cell states and clonotypes for spatial and functional validation, not causal proof. Among candidate pathways, the IL-6–STAT3–IL-17 axis currently has the strongest AD-specific preclinical rationale, but existing interventions are largely non-T-cell-restricted and initiated before or during disease induction. Stronger causal attribution requires convergent human evidence, post-lesion T-cell-restricted perturbation, disease-progression endpoints, and rescue or target-engagement studies. The subacute phase after anatomical and haemodynamic stabilisation may offer a window to study persistent injury-amplifying T-cell responses, whereas early acute and perioperative immunomodulation remains unsupported. Current evidence supports altered T-cell states after AD onset but does not establish an initiating role. Near-term priorities should be prospective biomarker validation and post-lesion mechanistic studies rather than T-cell-directed immuno­modulation during the early acute and perioperative phases. Clinical translation should await reproducible associations linked to stage-specific causal mechanisms and acceptable safety.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.34860859
Primary Topic
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

T-cell states in aortic dissection: from molecular immune profiling toward causal and translational validation

Yeting Li, Yihao Wang, Jianxiang Song, Xiang Ye et al.
4 links
Figshare
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
article

T-cell states in aortic dissection: from molecular immune profiling toward causal and translational validation

Yeting Li, Yihao Wang, Jianxiang Song, Xiang Ye, Xia Li, Hao Zhu
article en

Abstract

Single-cell RNA sequencing and T-cell receptor profiling reveal substantial T-cell heterogeneity in aortic dissection (AD), but whether these responses contribute to vascular injury or reflect post-onset immune activation remains uncertain. This review evaluates human and experimental evidence by disease stage, tissue compartment, functional validation, T-cell specificity, and intervention timing, distinguishing descriptive profiling from evidence supporting causal and translational inference. Human studies identify Th1/Th17-associated, CD8+ cytotoxicity-associated, and regulatory T-cell alterations, with stage-related differences in T-cell composition and clonality. Most evidence is cross-sectional and obtained after clinical onset. Antigen specificity, direct aortic-wall cytotoxicity, impaired Treg suppression, and T-cell-mediated aortic-wall injury remain unproven. Single-cell and TCR profiling identify candidate T-cell states and clonotypes for spatial and functional validation, not causal proof. Among candidate pathways, the IL-6–STAT3–IL-17 axis currently has the strongest AD-specific preclinical rationale, but existing interventions are largely non-T-cell-restricted and initiated before or during disease induction. Stronger causal attribution requires convergent human evidence, post-lesion T-cell-restricted perturbation, disease-progression endpoints, and rescue or target-engagement studies. The subacute phase after anatomical and haemodynamic stabilisation may offer a window to study persistent injury-amplifying T-cell responses, whereas early acute and perioperative immunomodulation remains unsupported. Current evidence supports altered T-cell states after AD onset but does not establish an initiating role. Near-term priorities should be prospective biomarker validation and post-lesion mechanistic studies rather than T-cell-directed immuno­modulation during the early acute and perioperative phases. Clinical translation should await reproducible associations linked to stage-specific causal mechanisms and acceptable safety.

Figshare
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
T-cell states in aortic dissection: from molecular immune profiling toward causal and translational validation — Yeting Li, Yihao Wang, et al. · Figshare (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS