Risk-Based Cybersecurity Threat Prioritization in Digital Twin-Enabled Cyber-Physical Systems

Digital Twin (DT)-enabled cyber-physical systems (CPS) face cybersecurity risks due to their complex connections and high levels of interdependence. Traditional methods, for assessing risk often fail to rank these threats. This is especially true when expert opinions include ambiguity, uncertainty or unclear information. A Type 2 Neutrosophic Entropy– Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to COmpromise Solution (Entropy- MARCOS) framework for cybersecurity threat prioritization in DT-enabled CPS is proposed in this paper. The uncertainty and indeterminacy present in expert evaluations are represented by Type 2 Neutrosophic Numbers (T2NNs). While the MARCOS technique is used to assess and rank cybersecurity threats according to their relative utility with respect to ideal and anti-ideal solutions, the Entropy method is used to extract objective criterion weights from the decision matrix. Six criteria, including cybersecurity-specific and Digital Twin-related characteristics, are used to evaluate five cybersecurity threats: Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attacks, Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attacks, data spoofing, assaults targeting the Digital Twin, and zero-day exploits. The results show that Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attacks (A1) are ranked second, after zero-day exploits (A5). Despite changes in the relative placements of the other dangers, the sensitivity analysis shows that A5 continues to be the most dangerous threat across all studied variations in the weight provided to the Damage criterion. Additionally, the comparison with Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) shows that SAW produces a ranking identical to that of MARCOS (ρ = 1.00), while TOPSIS differs only by swapping the third and fourth positions (ρ = 0.90 with both methods). All three methods agree on the first (A5), second (A1), and last (A3) positions, indicating strong agreement among the ranking outcomes. In Digital Twin-enabled CPS inside Industry 4.0 contexts, the suggested framework offers an organized and data-driven method for ranking cybersecurity hazards and assisting with cybersecurity risk management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neutrosophic Systems with Applications
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63689/2993-7159.1374
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk-Based Cybersecurity Threat Prioritization in Digital Twin-Enabled Cyber-Physical Systems

Ahmed M. AbdelMouty, Alshaimaa A. Tantawy, Nada Mohamed
Neutrosophic Systems with Applications
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

Risk-Based Cybersecurity Threat Prioritization in Digital Twin-Enabled Cyber-Physical Systems

Ahmed M. AbdelMouty, Alshaimaa A. Tantawy, Nada Mohamed
article en

Abstract

Digital Twin (DT)-enabled cyber-physical systems (CPS) face cybersecurity risks due to their complex connections and high levels of interdependence. Traditional methods, for assessing risk often fail to rank these threats. This is especially true when expert opinions include ambiguity, uncertainty or unclear information. A Type 2 Neutrosophic Entropy– Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to COmpromise Solution (Entropy- MARCOS) framework for cybersecurity threat prioritization in DT-enabled CPS is proposed in this paper. The uncertainty and indeterminacy present in expert evaluations are represented by Type 2 Neutrosophic Numbers (T2NNs). While the MARCOS technique is used to assess and rank cybersecurity threats according to their relative utility with respect to ideal and anti-ideal solutions, the Entropy method is used to extract objective criterion weights from the decision matrix. Six criteria, including cybersecurity-specific and Digital Twin-related characteristics, are used to evaluate five cybersecurity threats: Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attacks, Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attacks, data spoofing, assaults targeting the Digital Twin, and zero-day exploits. The results show that Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attacks (A1) are ranked second, after zero-day exploits (A5). Despite changes in the relative placements of the other dangers, the sensitivity analysis shows that A5 continues to be the most dangerous threat across all studied variations in the weight provided to the Damage criterion. Additionally, the comparison with Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) shows that SAW produces a ranking identical to that of MARCOS (ρ = 1.00), while TOPSIS differs only by swapping the third and fourth positions (ρ = 0.90 with both methods). All three methods agree on the first (A5), second (A1), and last (A3) positions, indicating strong agreement among the ranking outcomes. In Digital Twin-enabled CPS inside Industry 4.0 contexts, the suggested framework offers an organized and data-driven method for ranking cybersecurity hazards and assisting with cybersecurity risk management.

Neutrosophic Systems with ApplicationsVol. 26(10)
Zagazig University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon