Effect of Therapeutic Manipulation of Superficial Back and Front Myofascial Lines in a Bank Employee with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Case Report

Background: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is common among office workers and may be influenced by prolonged sitting, altered lumbopelvic control and impaired soft-tissue mobility. Myofascial-line approaches are used clinically to address movement restrictions beyond the painful lumbar region although evidence for the use of superficial back and front lines remains limited. Case Presentation: A 38-year-old woman employed in a bank presented with a 3-month history of bilateral, non-radicular low back pain and thoracolumbar stiffness, aggravated by prolonged sitting and standing and temporarily relieved by rest and stretching. Clinical examination identified lumbar hyperlordosis, anterior pelvic tilt, pelvic asymmetry, restricted hip extension, suspected iliopsoas dysfunction, reduced thoracolumbar fascial glide, and three positive provocation tests from a five-test sacroiliac-joint cluster. Neurological examination was normal, and no red-flag features were identified. Discussion: Treatment was delivered over 3 weeks in two phases. Phase 1 included moist heat, muscle-energy-based post-isometric relaxation for the iliopsoas, diaphragmatic breathing, remote soft-tissue treatment of the calf region within a superficial back-line framework, local fascial manipulation, and adjunctive electrotherapy. Phase 2 incorporated progressive distal-to-proximal strengthening and lumbopelvic integration. The Numeric Pain Rating Scale score decreased from 6/10 to 3.25/10, the Oswestry Disability Index score decreased from 35.5% to 22.2%, the Short Form-36 physical component score increased from 28.75 to 70.5, and the Global Rating of Change score was +6. No adverse events were reported. Conclusion: The case describes an improvement in pain, disability, self-reported physical health, and selected mobility measures after a multimodal physiotherapy program incorporating superficial myofascial-line techniques and progressive exercise.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/ajcrmh/2026/v9i1354
Primary Topic
Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Therapeutic Manipulation of Superficial Back and Front Myofascial Lines in a Bank Employee with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Case Report

Navpreet Kaur
1 links
Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
article

Effect of Therapeutic Manipulation of Superficial Back and Front Myofascial Lines in a Bank Employee with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Case Report

Navpreet Kaur
article en

Abstract

Background: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is common among office workers and may be influenced by prolonged sitting, altered lumbopelvic control and impaired soft-tissue mobility. Myofascial-line approaches are used clinically to address movement restrictions beyond the painful lumbar region although evidence for the use of superficial back and front lines remains limited. Case Presentation: A 38-year-old woman employed in a bank presented with a 3-month history of bilateral, non-radicular low back pain and thoracolumbar stiffness, aggravated by prolonged sitting and standing and temporarily relieved by rest and stretching. Clinical examination identified lumbar hyperlordosis, anterior pelvic tilt, pelvic asymmetry, restricted hip extension, suspected iliopsoas dysfunction, reduced thoracolumbar fascial glide, and three positive provocation tests from a five-test sacroiliac-joint cluster. Neurological examination was normal, and no red-flag features were identified. Discussion: Treatment was delivered over 3 weeks in two phases. Phase 1 included moist heat, muscle-energy-based post-isometric relaxation for the iliopsoas, diaphragmatic breathing, remote soft-tissue treatment of the calf region within a superficial back-line framework, local fascial manipulation, and adjunctive electrotherapy. Phase 2 incorporated progressive distal-to-proximal strengthening and lumbopelvic integration. The Numeric Pain Rating Scale score decreased from 6/10 to 3.25/10, the Oswestry Disability Index score decreased from 35.5% to 22.2%, the Short Form-36 physical component score increased from 28.75 to 70.5, and the Global Rating of Change score was +6. No adverse events were reported. Conclusion: The case describes an improvement in pain, disability, self-reported physical health, and selected mobility measures after a multimodal physiotherapy program incorporating superficial myofascial-line techniques and progressive exercise.

Vol. 9(1)
Sri Guru Granth Sahib World University (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon