Current practices of retention forestry in plantations across Japan

To implement retention forestry in conifer plantations in Japan on a broad scale, it is necessary to understand the characteristics of suitable forest stands and regional differences in feasibility. We focused on retention forestry and similar practices that involve retaining a part of the forest structure in young, planted forests after high-ratio harvesting. We gathered information on these existing practices through personal contacts, published reports, academic presentations, and websites. We organized them in terms of (1) their geographical distribution, (2) characteristics of pre-harvest stands, (3) species and amounts of retained trees, and (4) forest managers and their aims/reasons for implementation. We found that the distribution of practices retaining broad-leaved trees in harvested areas was spatially biased across Japan and was concentrated in Hokkaido, Chugoku (western Honshu), and Shikoku (the fourth‑largest island). In most cases, the retained tree density was 10–20 trees/ha, and many practices have been implemented by public institutes. The reasons for implementation, excluding biodiversity conservation, varied among forest managers and included enhanced timber production (e.g. promoting broad-leaved tree growth and natural regeneration) and reducing labor costs. In some cases, although canopy trees were scarcely retained, regenerating and sprouting trees were retained. Our results suggest that the species and number of retained trees vary across regions. The development of criteria and assessment systems is required to evaluate the ecological and social benefits of practices with varying targets and aims.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Forest Research
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13416979.2026.2755214
Primary Topic
Forest Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Current practices of retention forestry in plantations across Japan

Yuichi Yamaura, Kazuhiro Kawamura, Satoshi Yamanaka
Journal of Forest Research
Forest Management and Policy
article

Current practices of retention forestry in plantations across Japan

Yuichi Yamaura, Kazuhiro Kawamura, Satoshi Yamanaka
article en

Abstract

To implement retention forestry in conifer plantations in Japan on a broad scale, it is necessary to understand the characteristics of suitable forest stands and regional differences in feasibility. We focused on retention forestry and similar practices that involve retaining a part of the forest structure in young, planted forests after high-ratio harvesting. We gathered information on these existing practices through personal contacts, published reports, academic presentations, and websites. We organized them in terms of (1) their geographical distribution, (2) characteristics of pre-harvest stands, (3) species and amounts of retained trees, and (4) forest managers and their aims/reasons for implementation. We found that the distribution of practices retaining broad-leaved trees in harvested areas was spatially biased across Japan and was concentrated in Hokkaido, Chugoku (western Honshu), and Shikoku (the fourth‑largest island). In most cases, the retained tree density was 10–20 trees/ha, and many practices have been implemented by public institutes. The reasons for implementation, excluding biodiversity conservation, varied among forest managers and included enhanced timber production (e.g. promoting broad-leaved tree growth and natural regeneration) and reducing labor costs. In some cases, although canopy trees were scarcely retained, regenerating and sprouting trees were retained. Our results suggest that the species and number of retained trees vary across regions. The development of criteria and assessment systems is required to evaluate the ecological and social benefits of practices with varying targets and aims.

Journal of Forest Research
Hokkaido University (JP)
Life on land
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Forest Management and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon