Artificial Intelligence Applied to Echocardiography for Detection of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction and Elevated Filling Pressures: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-Analysis

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for nearly half of heart failure cases and remains difficult to diagnose non-invasively. Artificial intelligence (AI) applied to echocardiography may improve detection, but its aggregate diagnostic accuracy has not been quantified. We performed a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis of AI-enabled echocardiography for identifying HFpEF, elevated left ventricular filling pressure, or diastolic dysfunction. MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched from inception to June 2026. Studies reporting the accuracy of AI models applied to echocardiography against invasive, guideline-adjudicated, or ASE/EACVI reference standards were included. Sensitivity and specificity were pooled using a bivariate random-effects (Reitsma) model, with a summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, diagnostic odds ratio, and likelihood ratios. Risk of bias was assessed with QUADAS-2. Eight studies (2770 participants; 1317 [47.5%] with the target condition) were included. Pooled sensitivity was 84.0% (95% CI: 73.0-91.0%) and specificity 83.0% (95% CI: 73.0-89.0%), with an area under the summary ROC curve of 0.875 (95% CI: 0.791-0.930). The diagnostic odds ratio was 24.73 (95% CI: 18.46-33.12); positive and negative likelihood ratios were 4.84 and 0.20. Heterogeneity was high. Performance did not differ by AI architecture but varied significantly by reference standard. No small-study effects were detected. AI-enabled echocardiography shows good pooled accuracy for detecting HFpEF and elevated filling pressures, supporting its diagnostic potential. High heterogeneity and reference-standard dependence warrant larger, prospectively validated studies before routine clinical adoption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cardiology in Review
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/crd.0000000000001523
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence Applied to Echocardiography for Detection of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction and Elevated Filling Pressures: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-Analysis

Abdulmajeed Faleh Alosail, Faisal A. Al-Harbi, Dana Abdullah Alrebdi, Hamad Suliman Alhabdan et al.
3 links
Cardiology in Review
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
article

Artificial Intelligence Applied to Echocardiography for Detection of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction and Elevated Filling Pressures: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-Analysis

Abdulmajeed Faleh Alosail, Faisal A. Al-Harbi, Dana Abdullah Alrebdi, Hamad Suliman Alhabdan, Osamah Hamdi AlMutairi, Faisal Mohammed Alharbi, Hatim Hussain Alawaji, Norah Sulaiman Alsultan
article en

Abstract

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for nearly half of heart failure cases and remains difficult to diagnose non-invasively. Artificial intelligence (AI) applied to echocardiography may improve detection, but its aggregate diagnostic accuracy has not been quantified. We performed a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis of AI-enabled echocardiography for identifying HFpEF, elevated left ventricular filling pressure, or diastolic dysfunction. MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched from inception to June 2026. Studies reporting the accuracy of AI models applied to echocardiography against invasive, guideline-adjudicated, or ASE/EACVI reference standards were included. Sensitivity and specificity were pooled using a bivariate random-effects (Reitsma) model, with a summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, diagnostic odds ratio, and likelihood ratios. Risk of bias was assessed with QUADAS-2. Eight studies (2770 participants; 1317 [47.5%] with the target condition) were included. Pooled sensitivity was 84.0% (95% CI: 73.0-91.0%) and specificity 83.0% (95% CI: 73.0-89.0%), with an area under the summary ROC curve of 0.875 (95% CI: 0.791-0.930). The diagnostic odds ratio was 24.73 (95% CI: 18.46-33.12); positive and negative likelihood ratios were 4.84 and 0.20. Heterogeneity was high. Performance did not differ by AI architecture but varied significantly by reference standard. No small-study effects were detected. AI-enabled echocardiography shows good pooled accuracy for detecting HFpEF and elevated filling pressures, supporting its diagnostic potential. High heterogeneity and reference-standard dependence warrant larger, prospectively validated studies before routine clinical adoption.

Cardiology in Review
Qassim University (SA), King Faisal University (SA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon