Classification of Internal and External Economic Threats: A Structured Review and Typology for Economic Security Analysis

Background. Governments, central banks and international organizations routinely speak of threats to economic security, yet the term is used loosely. Distinguishing internal threats, which originate within a national economy, from external threats, which originate beyond its borders, is a foundational step in risk assessment, but existing classifications are fragmented across macroeconomics, finance, political economy and security studies. Objective. This article develops and tests a classification of economic threats using origin as the primary criterion and supplements it with secondary criteria: nature, transmission channel, time horizon and controllability. Methods. A structured conceptual review of the economic-crisis, vulnerability and economic-security literatures was carried out. Threat categories were derived inductively, organized in a two-level typology, and then applied to five historical and contemporary episodes: the 1997–98 Asian crisis, the 2008 global financial crisis, the COVID-19 shock, the 2022 energy shock and the 2026 outlook as described by the IMF. Results. Seven internal threat classes (fiscal, monetary and price, financial-sector, structural, institutional, social-distributional and policy-uncertainty) and seven external classes (trade and terms-of-trade, capital-flow and exchange-rate, global financial contagion, external-debt, geopolitical and sanctions, supply-chain and technological dependence, and global physical shocks) were identified. In every episode examined, the severity of damage depended less on the origin of the shock than on the interaction between an external trigger and pre-existing internal vulnerability. Conclusions. Origin-based classification is necessary but not sufficient. A useful typology must be paired with an assessment of vulnerability and transmission. A third, hybrid class, in which internal weaknesses convert external shocks into crises, is proposed to capture this interaction, and a monitoring framework is outlined.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23761626
Primary Topic
Global Financial Crisis and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Classification of Internal and External Economic Threats: A Structured Review and Typology for Economic Security Analysis

Parizoda Shomurodova
2 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Global Financial Crisis and Policies
article

Classification of Internal and External Economic Threats: A Structured Review and Typology for Economic Security Analysis

Parizoda Shomurodova
article en

Abstract

Background. Governments, central banks and international organizations routinely speak of threats to economic security, yet the term is used loosely. Distinguishing internal threats, which originate within a national economy, from external threats, which originate beyond its borders, is a foundational step in risk assessment, but existing classifications are fragmented across macroeconomics, finance, political economy and security studies. Objective. This article develops and tests a classification of economic threats using origin as the primary criterion and supplements it with secondary criteria: nature, transmission channel, time horizon and controllability. Methods. A structured conceptual review of the economic-crisis, vulnerability and economic-security literatures was carried out. Threat categories were derived inductively, organized in a two-level typology, and then applied to five historical and contemporary episodes: the 1997–98 Asian crisis, the 2008 global financial crisis, the COVID-19 shock, the 2022 energy shock and the 2026 outlook as described by the IMF. Results. Seven internal threat classes (fiscal, monetary and price, financial-sector, structural, institutional, social-distributional and policy-uncertainty) and seven external classes (trade and terms-of-trade, capital-flow and exchange-rate, global financial contagion, external-debt, geopolitical and sanctions, supply-chain and technological dependence, and global physical shocks) were identified. In every episode examined, the severity of damage depended less on the origin of the shock than on the interaction between an external trigger and pre-existing internal vulnerability. Conclusions. Origin-based classification is necessary but not sufficient. A useful typology must be paired with an assessment of vulnerability and transmission. A third, hybrid class, in which internal weaknesses convert external shocks into crises, is proposed to capture this interaction, and a monitoring framework is outlined.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Tashkent State University of Economics (UZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Global Financial Crisis and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon