Authoritarian Organizational Culture as a Contest of Expressing Deference to the Leader

This paper models authoritarian organizational culture as a contest among subordinates to show more deference to their leader than their peers do. Effort spent on deference is taken from production, which the leader turns into output. Under a fixed pay scale, the output lost rises with the subordinates’ emotional dependence on the leader. A leader who sets pay herself chooses the level of deference from her capability and her relative taste for deference; dependence then only sets the pay she must offer. A leader who values deference rewards it with a discretionary pool once her taste passes a threshold, so part of dependence follows her power. Another part, following Buchanan’s (2005) parental socialism, is a demand from below for an authority that takes responsibility. Deference driven by fear should vanish when the leader’s power is removed; deference driven by parental socialism should persist.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23760479
Primary Topic
Economic Theory and Institutions
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Authoritarian Organizational Culture as a Contest of Expressing Deference to the Leader

Gwang-Syung George Hwang
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Economic Theory and Institutions
preprint

Authoritarian Organizational Culture as a Contest of Expressing Deference to the Leader

Gwang-Syung George Hwang
preprint en

Abstract

This paper models authoritarian organizational culture as a contest among subordinates to show more deference to their leader than their peers do. Effort spent on deference is taken from production, which the leader turns into output. Under a fixed pay scale, the output lost rises with the subordinates’ emotional dependence on the leader. A leader who sets pay herself chooses the level of deference from her capability and her relative taste for deference; dependence then only sets the pay she must offer. A leader who values deference rewards it with a discretionary pool once her taste passes a threshold, so part of dependence follows her power. Another part, following Buchanan’s (2005) parental socialism, is a demand from below for an authority that takes responsibility. Deference driven by fear should vanish when the leader’s power is removed; deference driven by parental socialism should persist.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Economic Theory and Institutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon