Macular Retinal Ganglion Cell Counts and Central Visual Field Sensitivity in Glaucoma: A Comparison of Logarithmic and Linear Scales

Background/Aim: To evaluate the structure-function relationship between mean central differential light sensitivity, scaled in decibels (dB) and linear units (1/L), and estimated macular retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) counts derived using Medeiros’ integrated algorithms in glaucoma patients. Materials and Methods: In this study of 55 eyes, peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness was measured via spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), and functional sensitivity was assessed using 24-2 standard automated perimetry. Macular RGC counts were calculated from temporal sectors using Medeiros’ formulas. Functional data averaged the 16 central perimetric points. Regression models and Pearson coefficients (r) compared both scaling methods. Results: Macular RGC count averaged 465,939.5±213,096.2. The logarithmic model (dB) demonstrated an exceptional fit [y=−47.96+5.86ln(x); adjusted R2=0.8891; r=0.9440; p<0.0001]. The linear model (1/L) showed a strong correlation (y=−133.62+0.0019x; adjusted R2=0.7647; r=0.8770; p<0.0001), explaining 12% less variance overall. Conclusion: While the logarithmic scale offers superior overall fit, the linear scale (1/L) is clinically critical for detecting early, “silent” neural loss masked by perimetric data compression. These findings support optimizing the standard 24-2 grid through localized “macular cluster indices” to improve pre-perimetric glaucoma detection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
In Vivo
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.14504
Primary Topic
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Macular Retinal Ganglion Cell Counts and Central Visual Field Sensitivity in Glaucoma: A Comparison of Logarithmic and Linear Scales

Marco Ciancaglini, Paolo Carpineto, Silvio Di Staso, Stefano Pio et al.
In Vivo
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
article

Macular Retinal Ganglion Cell Counts and Central Visual Field Sensitivity in Glaucoma: A Comparison of Logarithmic and Linear Scales

Marco Ciancaglini, Paolo Carpineto, Silvio Di Staso, Stefano Pio, ARIANNA ASADI, GIAMPAOLO TROIANO
article en

Abstract

Background/Aim: To evaluate the structure-function relationship between mean central differential light sensitivity, scaled in decibels (dB) and linear units (1/L), and estimated macular retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) counts derived using Medeiros’ integrated algorithms in glaucoma patients. Materials and Methods: In this study of 55 eyes, peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness was measured via spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), and functional sensitivity was assessed using 24-2 standard automated perimetry. Macular RGC counts were calculated from temporal sectors using Medeiros’ formulas. Functional data averaged the 16 central perimetric points. Regression models and Pearson coefficients (r) compared both scaling methods. Results: Macular RGC count averaged 465,939.5±213,096.2. The logarithmic model (dB) demonstrated an exceptional fit [y=−47.96+5.86ln(x); adjusted R2=0.8891; r=0.9440; p<0.0001]. The linear model (1/L) showed a strong correlation (y=−133.62+0.0019x; adjusted R2=0.7647; r=0.8770; p<0.0001), explaining 12% less variance overall. Conclusion: While the logarithmic scale offers superior overall fit, the linear scale (1/L) is clinically critical for detecting early, “silent” neural loss masked by perimetric data compression. These findings support optimizing the standard 24-2 grid through localized “macular cluster indices” to improve pre-perimetric glaucoma detection.

In VivoVol. 40(6)
University of L'Aquila (IT), University of Chieti-Pescara (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon