Right after the cut: subjectivity and the Real in Iran’s 2025–2026 uprising

Abstract This article explores how Iranians in the diaspora make sense of their encounter with the 2025–2026 uprising and the subsequent massacre through eight in‑depth interviews, analysed via Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis within a Lacanian psychoanalytic frame. The diaspora position, rather than being a diminished version of proximate experience, has its own singularity in encountering the massacre through an interruption inflicted by the state, that is, the blackout, followed by a flood of images, videos, and estimated figures. This article reads the Lacanian cut as the rupture of the massacre itself, posited at the breaks in participants’ speech, in an interval when the inscription of the event was in process and had not been sealed by the Other. Combining Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis with a Lacanian frame allows the participants’ experiences to be held along the points at which their accounts reach an impasse. Keywords: Iran; diaspora; Lacan; Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis; trauma; state violence

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Subjectivity
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-026-00261-5
Primary Topic
Memory, violence, and history
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Right after the cut: subjectivity and the Real in Iran’s 2025–2026 uprising

Nazanin Shahbazi
2 links
Subjectivity
Memory, violence, and history
article

Right after the cut: subjectivity and the Real in Iran’s 2025–2026 uprising

Nazanin Shahbazi
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article explores how Iranians in the diaspora make sense of their encounter with the 2025–2026 uprising and the subsequent massacre through eight in‑depth interviews, analysed via Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis within a Lacanian psychoanalytic frame. The diaspora position, rather than being a diminished version of proximate experience, has its own singularity in encountering the massacre through an interruption inflicted by the state, that is, the blackout, followed by a flood of images, videos, and estimated figures. This article reads the Lacanian cut as the rupture of the massacre itself, posited at the breaks in participants’ speech, in an interval when the inscription of the event was in process and had not been sealed by the Other. Combining Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis with a Lacanian frame allows the participants’ experiences to be held along the points at which their accounts reach an impasse. Keywords: Iran; diaspora; Lacan; Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis; trauma; state violence

Subjectivity
University of Manchester (GB)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Memory, violence, and history
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon