Benchmarking YOLO generations for explainable incremental threat detection: weight initialisation, architecture, and training budget

Abstract Incremental learning frameworks for real-time object detection have attracted growing interest in security-critical surveillance, yet empirical evaluations comparing modern You Only Look Once (YOLO) generations under controlled initialisation conditions remain scarce. Kutlu and Emiroğlu [1] reported an [email protected] of 0.886 for YOLOv8-nano on a two-class weapon benchmark under reported random initialisation. However, our controlled multi-seed replication ( $$N=5$$ N = 5 ) reveals an empirical reproducibility discrepancy: strictly random initialisation yields only $$0.538 \pm 0.027$$ 0.538 ± 0.027 [email protected] under the ten-epoch-per-round protocol, whereas COCO-pretrained initialisation reaches $$0.911 \pm 0.010$$ 0.911 ± 0.010 , indicating substantial sensitivity to initial weight representations and uncontrolled implementation factors. To disentangle these factors, we conduct a full factorial benchmark across 12 conditions examining YOLOv8, YOLO11, and YOLOv12 nano-variants under both random and COCO-pretrained initialisation with two epoch budgets (10 and 100 epochs/round) across five sequential data-incremental rounds ( $$N=60$$ N = 60 runs). Factorial analysis of variance indicates that weight initialisation accounts for the primary share of variance ( $$F(1, 48) = 5141.1, p < 10^{-15}, \eta ^2 = 0.484, \text {partial } \eta _p^2 = 0.991, \text {Cohen's } d = 1.90$$ F ( 1 , 48 ) = 5141.1 , p < 10 - 15 , η 2 = 0.484 , partial η p 2 = 0.991 , Cohen's d = 1.90 ), whereas architectural generation contributes marginally ( $$\eta ^2 = 0.011$$ η 2 = 0.011 ). Extended training reduces but does not eliminate this performance gap, while freeze-strategy ablations show that fine-tuning neck and head atop a frozen COCO backbone matches full fine-tuning within 0.025 mAP while reducing trainable parameters by 40.3–53.4%. Control experiments demonstrate that pretraining provides an immediate zero-shot advantage on the knife category (which overlaps with COCO class 43) while pistol yields zero baseline detections. Decomposed inference latency profiling on an Apple M1 CPU edge device establishes end-to-end margins relative to operational deadlines (33.3 ms for 30 FPS surveillance, 16.7 ms for 60 FPS capture), with YOLOv8n reaching 14.5 FPS and YOLO11n reaching 13.8 FPS in FP32, indicating that real-time throughput on such CPU-only targets requires GPU acceleration or model optimisation. Finally, Eigen-CAM and Integrated Gradients analyses audit spatial attribution focus, verifying that incremental updates preserve model interpretability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Real-Time Image Processing
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11554-026-01999-6
Primary Topic
Advanced Neural Network Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking YOLO generations for explainable incremental threat detection: weight initialisation, architecture, and training budget

Mani Ghahremani, Anna Rösner, Gelayol Golcarenarenji, Morgan Woodford et al.
1 links
Journal of Real-Time Image Processing
Advanced Neural Network Applications
article

Benchmarking YOLO generations for explainable incremental threat detection: weight initialisation, architecture, and training budget

Mani Ghahremani, Anna Rösner, Gelayol Golcarenarenji, Morgan Woodford, Mishanil Kazreen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Incremental learning frameworks for real-time object detection have attracted growing interest in security-critical surveillance, yet empirical evaluations comparing modern You Only Look Once (YOLO) generations under controlled initialisation conditions remain scarce. Kutlu and Emiroğlu [1] reported an [email protected] of 0.886 for YOLOv8-nano on a two-class weapon benchmark under reported random initialisation. However, our controlled multi-seed replication ( $$N=5$$ N = 5 ) reveals an empirical reproducibility discrepancy: strictly random initialisation yields only $$0.538 \pm 0.027$$ 0.538 ± 0.027 [email protected] under the ten-epoch-per-round protocol, whereas COCO-pretrained initialisation reaches $$0.911 \pm 0.010$$ 0.911 ± 0.010 , indicating substantial sensitivity to initial weight representations and uncontrolled implementation factors. To disentangle these factors, we conduct a full factorial benchmark across 12 conditions examining YOLOv8, YOLO11, and YOLOv12 nano-variants under both random and COCO-pretrained initialisation with two epoch budgets (10 and 100 epochs/round) across five sequential data-incremental rounds ( $$N=60$$ N = 60 runs). Factorial analysis of variance indicates that weight initialisation accounts for the primary share of variance ( $$F(1, 48) = 5141.1, p < 10^{-15}, \eta ^2 = 0.484, \text {partial } \eta _p^2 = 0.991, \text {Cohen's } d = 1.90$$ F ( 1 , 48 ) = 5141.1 , p < 10 - 15 , η 2 = 0.484 , partial η p 2 = 0.991 , Cohen's d = 1.90 ), whereas architectural generation contributes marginally ( $$\eta ^2 = 0.011$$ η 2 = 0.011 ). Extended training reduces but does not eliminate this performance gap, while freeze-strategy ablations show that fine-tuning neck and head atop a frozen COCO backbone matches full fine-tuning within 0.025 mAP while reducing trainable parameters by 40.3–53.4%. Control experiments demonstrate that pretraining provides an immediate zero-shot advantage on the knife category (which overlaps with COCO class 43) while pistol yields zero baseline detections. Decomposed inference latency profiling on an Apple M1 CPU edge device establishes end-to-end margins relative to operational deadlines (33.3 ms for 30 FPS surveillance, 16.7 ms for 60 FPS capture), with YOLOv8n reaching 14.5 FPS and YOLO11n reaching 13.8 FPS in FP32, indicating that real-time throughput on such CPU-only targets requires GPU acceleration or model optimisation. Finally, Eigen-CAM and Integrated Gradients analyses audit spatial attribution focus, verifying that incremental updates preserve model interpretability.

Journal of Real-Time Image ProcessingVol. 23(6)
University of Portsmouth (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Advanced Neural Network Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon