Gatekeeping Europe

Abstract This article examines the 2023 EU –Tunisia Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on migration management within the EU ’s broader strategy of externalizing migration control. Using a qualitative comparative case study, it situates the EU –Tunisia agreement alongside earlier arrangements with Morocco (2013), Libya (2017), and the Italy–Albania protocol (2023). The analysis demonstrates the MoU largely reproduces established patterns of EU migration governance, prioritizing border security and containment over migrant protection and sustainable development. It highlights pronounced power asymmetries between the EU and Tunisia, and questions the EU ’s claim to normative leadership, revealing inconsistencies between its democracy and human rights discourse and its security-driven practices. The findings suggest that short-term migration control measures risk exacerbating human rights violations, reinforcing authoritarian tendencies, and undermining Tunisia’s fragile political trajectory. The article argues that current externalization practices require fundamental rethinking to promote accountability, dignity, and more balanced forms of cooperation in EU –Arab migration governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contemporary Arab Affairs
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/17550920-bja00124
Primary Topic
Gender and Women's Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gatekeeping Europe

Hakan Ömer Tunca, DORRA BESSAIS
Contemporary Arab Affairs
Gender and Women's Rights
article

Gatekeeping Europe

Hakan Ömer Tunca, DORRA BESSAIS
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article examines the 2023 EU –Tunisia Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on migration management within the EU ’s broader strategy of externalizing migration control. Using a qualitative comparative case study, it situates the EU –Tunisia agreement alongside earlier arrangements with Morocco (2013), Libya (2017), and the Italy–Albania protocol (2023). The analysis demonstrates the MoU largely reproduces established patterns of EU migration governance, prioritizing border security and containment over migrant protection and sustainable development. It highlights pronounced power asymmetries between the EU and Tunisia, and questions the EU ’s claim to normative leadership, revealing inconsistencies between its democracy and human rights discourse and its security-driven practices. The findings suggest that short-term migration control measures risk exacerbating human rights violations, reinforcing authoritarian tendencies, and undermining Tunisia’s fragile political trajectory. The article argues that current externalization practices require fundamental rethinking to promote accountability, dignity, and more balanced forms of cooperation in EU –Arab migration governance.

Contemporary Arab AffairsVol. 19(4)
Ankara University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Gender and Women's Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon